These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7150529)

  • 1. General assessment of the Multiload Cu250 intrauterine device. UK network of IUCD research clinics.
    Snowden R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):58-65. PubMed ID: 7150529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The IUCD in nulliparous women: with special reference to the Multiload copper 250 'mini' and 'short' IUCDs.
    Goldstuck ND
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):54-7. PubMed ID: 7150528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
    Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
    Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Nova-T 200 intrauterine contraceptive device: a 12 year study.
    Baeyertz JD; Hartfield VJ
    N Z Med J; 1997 May; 110(1043):169-71. PubMed ID: 9196502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interim insertion of Multiload Cu 250 IUCD.
    Mylotte MJ; Loudon N
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):41-2. PubMed ID: 6758838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Expulsion of Nova-T380, Multiload 375, and Copper-T380A contraceptive devices inserted during cesarean delivery.
    Ragab A; Hamed HO; Alsammani MA; Shalaby H; Nabeil H; Barakat R; Fetih AN
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 25975871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Post-termination contraception: use of the Multiload Cu250.
    Loudon JD; Scott R; Hutchon DJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):46-50. PubMed ID: 6891262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early postpartum insertion of the Multiload Cu250 intrauterine device.
    Emens JM; Shah SR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):43-5. PubMed ID: 6758839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Copper intrauterine contraceptive devices in adolescent nulliparae.
    Weiner E; Berg AA; Johansson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Mar; 85(3):204-6. PubMed ID: 629899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Multiload CU250 in general practice.
    Gadsby R; Holden J
    Practitioner; 1988 Dec; 232(1460):1343, 1347. PubMed ID: 3256888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial].
    Zhang LJ; Weng LJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Aug; 29(8):481-3, 511. PubMed ID: 7835121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Five-year follow-up of two types of contraceptive device fitted during elective cesarean delivery.
    Elsedeek MS
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 25957802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375.
    Cole LP; Potts DM; Aranda C; Behlilovic B; Etman ES; Moreno J; Randic L
    Fertil Steril; 1985 Feb; 43(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 3881295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter clinical trial in Nigeria with Multiload-Cu250 (MLCu250) and Multiload-Cu375 (MLCu375) intrauterine devices.
    Van Dierendonck B; Ladipo OA; Ekwempu CC; Giwa-Osagie OF; Ulasi JN
    Adv Contracept; 1992 Dec; 8(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 1290334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Menstrual characteristics and ultrasonographic uterine cavity measurements predict bleeding and pain in nulligravid women using intrauterine contraception.
    Kaislasuo J; Heikinheimo O; Lähteenmäki P; Suhonen S
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1580-8. PubMed ID: 25990577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects.
    Hubacher D
    Contraception; 2007 Jun; 75(6 Suppl):S8-11. PubMed ID: 17531622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C.
    Contraception; 1997 Dec; 56(6):341-52. PubMed ID: 9494767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women].
    Prilepskaia VN; Mezhevitinova EA
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1991 Apr; (4):5-8. PubMed ID: 1862876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.