196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7150905)
1. Comparison of iopamidol with three other contrast media in orbital venography/cavernous sinography.
Macpherson P
Br J Radiol; 1982 Jul; 55(655):539-40. PubMed ID: 7150905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast agent induced thrombophlebitis following leg phlebography: iopamidol versus meglumine iothalamate.
Lea Thomas M; Keeling FP; Piaggio RB; Treweeke PS
Br J Radiol; 1984 Mar; 57(675):205-7. PubMed ID: 6365232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The risk of arachnoiditis from experimental nonionic contrast media.
Haughton VM; Ho KC
Radiology; 1980 Aug; 136(2):395-7. PubMed ID: 6773100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tri-iodoisophthaldiamide with meglumine lothalamate in phlebography of the leg.
Thomas ML; Briggs GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Apr; 138(4):725-7. PubMed ID: 7039276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Iopamidol compared with Conray in peripheral angiography.
Wojciechowski J; Johansson R; Björk L
Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(6):549-52. PubMed ID: 6763456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the side effects of urographic contrast media (iothalamate, diatrizoate, iodamide, iopamidol) within the scope of a CT study].
Stellamor K; Hruby W; Assinger S; Luckner H
Radiologe; 1984 Oct; 24(10):488-90. PubMed ID: 6505221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety of contrast media in cerebral angiography: iopamidol vs. methylglucamine iothalamate.
Bird CR; Drayer BP; Velaj R; Triolo PJ; Allen S; Bates M; Yeates AE; Heinz ER; Osborne DR
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1984; 5(6):801-3. PubMed ID: 6437183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of ionic and nonionic contrast media on the sickling phenomenon.
Rao VM; Rao AK; Steiner RM; Burka ER; Grainger RG; Ballas SK
Radiology; 1982 Jul; 144(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 7089282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The symptomatic complications of iopamidol (Niopam) and metrizamide (Amipaque) following lumbar radiculography.
Stoddart PG; Watt I
Br J Radiol; 1984 Apr; 57(676):349-50. PubMed ID: 6704672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium.
Partridge JB; Robinson PJ; Turnbull CM; Stoker JB; Boyle RM; Morrison GW
Clin Radiol; 1981 Jul; 32(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 6972848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Iopamidol vs. metrizamide myelography: clinical comparison of side effects.
Trevisan C; Malaguti C; Manfredini M; Tampieri D
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):306-8. PubMed ID: 6410728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inhibition of platelet function by contrast media: iopamidol and ioxaglate versus iothalamate. Work in progress.
Rao AK; Rao VM; Willis J; Beckett C; Steiner RM
Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):311-3. PubMed ID: 4011893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Adverse reactions during ascending cervical myelography using iopamidol and metrizamide--a double-blind study].
Bockenheimer S; Eichenlaub H
Rontgenpraxis; 1986 May; 39(5):171-4. PubMed ID: 3523789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adverse effects of water-soluble contrast media in myelography, cisternography and ventriculography. A review with special reference to metrizamide.
Skalpe IO
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1977; 355():359-70. PubMed ID: 400906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical comparison of metrizamide and iopamidol for myelography.
Turski PA; Sackett JF; Gentry LR; Strother CM; Matozzi F
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 6410729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Hemodynamic response to opacification of the left ventricle. Comparative study of 3 contrast media with different structures].
Petitier H; Crochet D; Bizais Y; de Laguerenne J; Grossetête R; Delumeau J
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):753-7. PubMed ID: 6670836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of radiographic quality and adverse reactions in myelography with iopamidol and metrizamide.
Bannon KR; Braun IF; Pinto RS; Manuell M; Sudilovsky A; Kricheff II
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):312-3. PubMed ID: 6410730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.
Velaj R; Drayer B; Albright R; Fram E
Neurology; 1985 Sep; 35(9):1290-8. PubMed ID: 3927186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Adverse reactions to high osmolarity contrast media. A comparative-prospective study].
Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; Rodríguez R
Rev Med Panama; 1994 Jan; 19(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7938712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arachnoiditis from myelography with iopamidol, metrizamide, and iocarmate compared in the animal model.
Haughton VM; Ho KC
Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(6 Suppl):S267. PubMed ID: 7203934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
