These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Speech audiometry in the young child. Jerger S; Jerger J; Abrams S Ear Hear; 1983; 4(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 6832508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN. Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Plomp R; Mimpen AM Audiology; 1979; 18(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 760724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S). Cameron S; Dillon H Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Norwegian Hearing in Noise Test for Children. Myhrum M; Tvete OE; Heldahl MG; Moen I; Soli SD Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 26462169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thresholds and psychometric functions of the individual spondaic words. Young LL; Dudley B; Gunter MB J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 25(4):586-93. PubMed ID: 7162160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Verification of normative values for the Swiss version of the Freiburg speech intelligibility test]. Kompis M; Krebs M; Häusler R HNO; 2006 Jun; 54(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 16189713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of threshold, slope, and PB max for monosyllabic words. Beattie RC; Raffin MJ J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 3990262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. Duquesnoy AJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1136-44. PubMed ID: 6643835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability in the determination of speech reception threshold (SRT). Hagerman B Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):195-202. PubMed ID: 531473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-retest variability in testing hearing of speech. Hughes EC; Arthur RH; Johnson RL J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 511653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone-conducted speech: intelligibility functions and threshold force levels for spondees. Beattie RC; Smiarowski RA Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7304720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of speech intelligibility in children with recurrent otitis media. Jerger S; Jerger J; Alford BR; Abrams S Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):138-45. PubMed ID: 6862115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spondee recognition threshold as a function of set size. Punch JL; Howard MT J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3990257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry. Hagerman B Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interlist equivalency of the CID W-22 word lists presented in quiet and in noise. Loven FC; Hawkins DB Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 6840418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the calibration of two commercially recorded versions of CID auditory test W-22. Gengel RW; Kupperman GL Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):229-31. PubMed ID: 7409362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]