These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7152157)

  • 1. Comparison of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and revised Tillman-Olsen methods for speech threshold measurement.
    Huff SJ; Nerbonne MA
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 7152157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of speech reception threshold. A comparison between two methods.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 7178820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds.
    Robinson DO; Koenigs MJ
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 4(6):227-30. PubMed ID: 511650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test (MAST) with young children.
    Mackie K; Dermody P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 3724121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determination of signal/noise threshold as part of individual hearing aid fitting.
    Skamris NP
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (Suppl 8):61-3. PubMed ID: 299122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spondee recognition threshold as a function of set size.
    Punch JL; Howard MT
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 May; 50(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3990257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Characteristics, advantages, and limits of matrix tests].
    Brand T; Wagener KC
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):182-188. PubMed ID: 27538937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "How I do it"--otology and neurology. A specific issue and its solution. Silent masking.
    Brown LA
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Dec; 88(12):2035. PubMed ID: 732501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Four spondee threshold procedures: a comparison.
    Wall LG; Davis LA; Myers DK
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 6734969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Saudi Arabic speech audiometry.
    Ashoor AA; Prochazka T
    Audiology; 1982; 21(6):493-508. PubMed ID: 7181742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech audiometry in the young child.
    Jerger S; Jerger J; Abrams S
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 6832508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone-conduction speech testing: calibration force and voltage levels for two vibrators.
    Beattie RC; Gager DW
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 7372021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pediatric speech intelligibility test: performance-intensity characteristics.
    Jerger S; Jerger J
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(6):325-34. PubMed ID: 7152156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Hedderich J; Müller-Deile J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 53(12):895-902. PubMed ID: 25140602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders].
    Dieroff HG; Mangoldt W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the cross hearing of spondaic words.
    Martin FN; Blythe ME
    J Aud Res; 1977 Oct; 17(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 617811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.