These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The choice of stimulus in the auditory brainstem response test for neurological and audiological examinations. Suzuki J; Yamane H Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():731-6. PubMed ID: 6953910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The inadequacy of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses in audiological applications. Eggermont JJ Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():707-9. PubMed ID: 6953905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The auditory brainstem response in neuro-otology: perspectives and problems. Hyde ML; Blair RL J Otolaryngol; 1981 Apr; 10(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 7241628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory screening of high risk infants with brainstem evoked responses and impedance audiometry. Crowell DH; Pang-Ching G; Anderson RE; Kapuniai LE; Teruya K; Doo G; Wright P; Stephens JK Hawaii Med J; 1980 Nov; 39(11):277-82. PubMed ID: 7216743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [BERA (brainstem electric response audiometry) in pediatrics]. Valcke H Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1981; 35(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 7315285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus waveforms used in brainstem response audiometry. Laukli E Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 6612216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of oto-acoustic emissions and brain stem electric response audiometry in the normal newborn and babies admitted to a special care baby unit. Stevens JC; Webb HD; Smith MF; Buffin JT; Ruddy H Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1987 May; 8(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 3595084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Threshold sensitivity and frequency specificity in auditory brainstem response audiometry. Davis H; Hirsh SK; Turpin LL; Peacock ME Audiology; 1985; 24(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 3977784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful auditory brainstem evoked response testing and test-age relationships in difficult-to-test children. Smyth V Aust Paediatr J; 1984 May; 20(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 6466227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of change of stimulus frequency on the prediction of audiograms. Jerger J; Hayes D Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():729-30. PubMed ID: 6953909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical considerations in the interpretation of auditory brainstem response audiometry. Jacobson JT; Novotny GM; Elliott S J Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 9(6):493-504. PubMed ID: 7206036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of auditory brain stem response and behavioral screening in high risk and normal newborn infants. Jacobson JT; Morehouse CR Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 6468782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cochlear and brainstem evoked response audiometry and electrical stimulation of the VIIIth nerve. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979 Mar; 11():1-181. PubMed ID: 299175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory evoked potential: clinical applications of brainstem electric response audiometry. Cummings RJ; Schroder TL J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 81(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 7351505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Auditory brainstem evoked response as a hearing test in infants and children: a follow up study. Weston PF; Manson JI Aust Paediatr J; 1985 May; 21(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 4038223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]