These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7153092)
1. Dosimetric analysis of stereo and orthogonal reconstruction of interstitial implants. Sharma SC; Williamson JF; Cytacki E Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1982 Oct; 8(10):1803-5. PubMed ID: 7153092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the reconstruction of seed positions from stereo and orthogonal radiographs for routine radiotherapy planning. Niroomand-Rad A; Thomadsen BR Radiat Med; 1990; 8(4):145-51. PubMed ID: 2281150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A three-film technique for reconstruction of radioactive seed implants. Amols HI; Rosen II Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 7322048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of geometric errors in the reconstruction of iridium-192 seed implants. Rosen II; Khan KM; Lane RG; Kelsey CA Med Phys; 1982; 9(2):220-3. PubMed ID: 7087907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An automatic seed identification technique for interstitial implants using three isocentric radiographs. Rosenthal MS; Nath R Med Phys; 1983; 10(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 6888362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid, accurate, three-dimensional location of multiple sees in implant radiotherapy treatment planning. Altschuler MD; Findlay PA; Epperson RD Phys Med Biol; 1983 Nov; 28(11):1305-18. PubMed ID: 6657743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an active magnetic resonance tracking system for interstitial brachytherapy. Wang W; Viswanathan AN; Damato AL; Chen Y; Tse Z; Pan L; Tokuda J; Seethamraju RT; Dumoulin CL; Schmidt EJ; Cormack RA Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7114-21. PubMed ID: 26632065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geometric reconstruction of seed implants using a three-film technique. Biggs PJ; Kelley DM Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):701-4. PubMed ID: 6689052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between tandem and ovoids and interstitial gynecologic template brachytherapy dosimetry using a hypothetical computer model. Hsu IC; Speight J; Hai J; Vigneault E; Phillips T; Pouliot J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Feb; 52(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 11872302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of tissue volume irradiated by intracavitary implants. Eisbruch A; Williamson JF; Dickson DR; Grigsby PW; Perez CA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Mar; 25(4):733-44. PubMed ID: 8018115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometric error of cervical point A calculated through traditional reconstruction procedures for brachytherapy treatment. Chang L; Ho SY; Yeh SA; Lee TF; Chen PY J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):457-468. PubMed ID: 26699316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Verification and source-position error analysis of film reconstruction techniques used in the brachytherapy planning systems. Chang L; Ho SY; Chui CS; Du YC; Chen T Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):4115-20. PubMed ID: 19810484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the reconstruction of brachytherapy implants in three-dimensions from stereo radiographs. Niroomand-Rad A; Thomadsen BR; Vainio P Radiother Oncol; 1987 Apr; 8(4):337-43. PubMed ID: 3588997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose-volume analysis for quality assurance of interstitial brachytherapy for breast cancer. Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Edmundson GK; Jaffray DA; Wong JW; Kini VR; Chen PY; Martinez AA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):803-10. PubMed ID: 10524437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the dosimetric coverage of interstitial high-dose-rate breast implants. Kestin LL; Jaffray DA; Edmundson GK; Martinez AA; Wong JW; Kini VR; Chen PY; Vicini FA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jan; 46(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10656370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the relative angle between orthogonal films for radioactive implants. Amols HI; Martel M Med Phys; 1988; 15(5):773-5. PubMed ID: 3185414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The accuracy of the line and point source approximations in Ir-192 dosimetry. Williamson JF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1986 Mar; 12(3):409-14. PubMed ID: 3957740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Permanent planar iodine-125 implants: the dosimetric effect of geometric parameters for idealized source configurations. Cormack RA; Holloway CL; O'Farrell D; Devlin PM Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(4):1310-5. PubMed ID: 17967321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D CT-based high-dose-rate breast brachytherapy implants: treatment planning and quality assurance. Das RK; Patel R; Shah H; Odau H; Kuske RR Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(4):1224-8. PubMed ID: 15234059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]