These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 715350)
21. [Diagnosis and management of drug allergy]. Muranaka M Naika; 1968 Feb; 21(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 4301009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Evaluation of allergic-type reactions to antibiotics and rapid immunotherapy]. Brunet JL; Boibieux A; Biron F; Bouhour D; Cozon G; Sainte-Laudy J; Chidiac C; Peyramond D Pathol Biol (Paris); 1999 May; 47(5):491-3. PubMed ID: 10418025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Current methods of detection of drug allergy]. Moskalewska K; Maciejowska E; Cygler J; Plonka T Przegl Dermatol; 1970; 57(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 5457379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Standardization of skin tests for diagnosis and prevention of hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin. Pagani M; Bonadonna P; Senna GE; Antico A Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2008; 145(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 17703101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Mechanisms and means of detection of accidents due to synthetic curarizing agents]. Moneret-Vautrin DA; Grilliat JP; Laxenaire MC Nouv Presse Med; 1979 Mar; 8(11):871. PubMed ID: 156348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Diagnosis of drug intolerance reaction of the skin]. Wozniak KD; Lübbe D Dermatol Monatsschr; 1974 Jun; 160(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 4848471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Immunoglobulin E-mediated immediate allergic reactions to dipyrone: value of basophil activation test in the identification of patients. Gómez E; Blanca-Lopez N; Torres MJ; Requena G; Rondon C; Canto G; Blanca M; Mayorga C Clin Exp Allergy; 2009 Aug; 39(8):1217-24. PubMed ID: 19400910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Drug allergies and drug hypersensitivities]. Demoly P Rev Prat; 2007 Jun; 57(12):1326-30. PubMed ID: 17717945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Detection of possible hypersensitivity to iodized contrast media and prophylactic measures]. Sabbah A; Knoepfler PJ; Menard E Ann Radiol (Paris); 1969; 12(9):875-82. PubMed ID: 5371358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Role of computerized analysis in improvement of drug therapy and prevention of drug-induced allergic reactions]. Angelutsa PA; Viktorov AP; Kalugin VE; Pozmogova IA Sov Med; 1990; (11):24-6. PubMed ID: 2075516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Diagnosis of drug allergies]. Girard JP Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1970 Jun; 59(26):951-3. PubMed ID: 4104159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Biological diagnosis of drug allergy using Shelley's test and the lymphoblastic transformation test (apropos of 232 tests)]. Vautrin DA; Janot C; Pupil P Rev Fr Allergol; 1971; 11(4):329-46. PubMed ID: 5147195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Drug hypersensitivity: a comparative study of in vitro lymphocyte stimulation test with in vivo skin window technique and other skin tests. Saha K; Kaur D; Singh R Indian J Med Res; 1975 Aug; 63(8):1110-24. PubMed ID: 765276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Diagnosis of drug allergies]. Francillon C Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1996 Mar; 116(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8658008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The lymphocyte transformation test for the diagnosis of drug allergy: sensitivity and specificity. Nyfeler B; Pichler WJ Clin Exp Allergy; 1997 Feb; 27(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 9061217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Value of some laboratory tests for diagnosis of drug allergy]. Popescu IG; Purice S Stud Cercet Med Interna; 1970; 11(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 4928841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [A comparison of lymphocyte stimulation test results and challenge test results in 19 cases of antituberculous drug-induced allergy]. Miyazawa T; Doi M; Mineshita M; Kurata T; Kitaguchi S; Furukawa N Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Aug; 31(8):920-3. PubMed ID: 8230888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]