These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7154804)

  • 1. [Objective hearing aid fitting].
    Stecker M
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1982 Dec; 61(12):678-82. PubMed ID: 7154804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The use of the stapedius reflex in the fitting of hearing aids (author transl)].
    Tato JM; Rainville MJ
    Audiology; 1976; 15(5):428-32. PubMed ID: 938349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CPA tumors with normal routine audiometry and positive reflex and BSER tests.
    Saunders AZ; Jackson RT
    Am J Otol; 1981 Apr; 2(4):318-23. PubMed ID: 6973282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: the effect of different control configurations.
    Dreschler WA; Keidser G; Convery E; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 18490863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
    Halpin C; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The value of brain-stem audiometry in the selection of hearing aids].
    Kiessling J
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Feb; 63(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 6700342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Correlation of subjective and objective methods of evaluating hearing threshold].
    Komazec Z; Milosević D; Filipović D
    Med Pregl; 2001; 54(7-8):332-7. PubMed ID: 11905181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold.
    Caner G; Olgun L; Gültekin G; Balaban M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):637-40. PubMed ID: 17667772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Over- and underestimation of hearing using the click-evoked brain stem P5].
    Debruyne F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1984; 38(6):573-8. PubMed ID: 6537711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.
    Halpin C; Thornton A; Hasso M
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8194681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using genetic algorithms with subjective input from human subjects: implications for fitting hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):370-80. PubMed ID: 17485986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in auditory behaviors of multiply handicapped children with deafness after hearing aid fitting.
    Kaga K; Shindo M; Tamai F; Tanaka Y
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Dec; (559):9-12. PubMed ID: 18340554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Stapedius-reflex-audiometry by measuring the threshold for the re-inforcement of a pre-existing reflex (author's transl)].
    Reker U; Baumgarten D
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Sep; 59(9):557-61. PubMed ID: 7464371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Automated system for individual selection of hearing aids].
    Ovsianik VP; Leliukh AP; Moroz BS; Tsisarenko AN
    Med Tekh; 1986; (2):35-9. PubMed ID: 3754613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nonsurgical factors predictive of postoperative hearing for patients with vestibular schwannoma.
    Robinette MS; Bauch CD; Olsen WO; Harner SG; Beatty CW
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 9391670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.