These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Classification in well-defined and ill-defined categories: evidence for common processing strategies. Martin RC; Caramazza A J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):320-53. PubMed ID: 6447192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Smith JD; Redford JS; Haas SM J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):390-401. PubMed ID: 18473665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying the internal structure of categories using a neural typicality measure. Davis T; Poldrack RA Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1720-37. PubMed ID: 23442348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Typicality effects in artificial categories: is there a hemisphere difference? Richards LG; Chiarello C Brain Lang; 1990 Jul; 39(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 2207623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feature-based versus exemplar-based strategies in preschoolers' category learning. Krascum RM; Andrews S J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Aug; 56(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 8366324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed. Hale S Child Dev; 1990 Jun; 61(3):653-63. PubMed ID: 2364741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories. Larochelle S; Richard S; Soulières I Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):929-61. PubMed ID: 11131822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production. Zotov V; Jones MN; Mewhort DJ Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):621-39. PubMed ID: 21264728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age differences in recall of categorized material: organization or retrieval? Morrison FJ; Lord C J Genet Psychol; 1982 Dec; 141(2d Half):233-41. PubMed ID: 7153773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories. Kalish CW Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):335-53. PubMed ID: 7791602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning. Livingston KR; Andrews JK Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. Gelman SA; Markman EM Child Dev; 1987 Dec; 58(6):1532-41. PubMed ID: 3691200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits. Humphreys GW; Forde EM Behav Brain Sci; 2001 Jun; 24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509. PubMed ID: 11682799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinguishing prototype-based and exemplar-based processes in dot-pattern category learning. Smith JD; Minda JP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):800-11. PubMed ID: 12109770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Taxonomic and ad hoc categorization within the two cerebral hemispheres. Shen Y; Aharoni BE; Mashal N Laterality; 2015; 20(5):517-29. PubMed ID: 25644310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]