These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 715592)

  • 1. Some design considerations on the stems of total hip replacement prostheses.
    Miles AW; Dall DM
    S Afr J Surg; 1978 Jun; 16(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 715592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of total hip prosthesis: the femoral stem.
    Brockhurst PJ; Svensson NL
    Med Prog Technol; 1977 Sep; 5(2):73-102. PubMed ID: 927397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total replacement of the hip joint.
    Riley LH; Hughes JL
    Surg Annu; 1973; 5():157-67. PubMed ID: 4793524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Morphological and biomechanical aspects of Al2O3 ceramic joint replacement. Experimental results and design considerations for human endoprostheses.
    Griss P; Heimke G; Von Andrian-Werburg H; Krempien B; Reipa S; Lauterbach HJ; Hartung HJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):177-88. PubMed ID: 1176500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Study on design method for the individual anatomical hip joint endoprosthesis].
    Gong X; Kang L; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 25(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18435265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
    Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Joint prostheses and braces.
    Wright V; Dowson D; Seedhom B
    Mod Trends Rheumatol; 1971; 2():46-59. PubMed ID: 4949591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fatigue fractures of the femoral component of Charnley and Charnley-Müller type total hip prostheses.
    Ducheyne P; De Meester P; Aernoudt E; Martens M; Mulier JC
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1975 Jul; 9(4):199-219. PubMed ID: 1176502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Considerations for implant design with application to custom prostheses [proceedings].
    Bartel DL
    Bull Hosp Joint Dis; 1977 Oct; 38(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 614870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Making simulation tests for hip joint prostheses more exact].
    Gatti A; Trentani C
    Chir Organi Mov; 1977; 63(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 616389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical considerations of multiple-component hip prostheses. Analysis of three failures of the Lippman transfixation hip prosthesis.
    Amstutz HC; Contini R; Johnson RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (106):131-9. PubMed ID: 1126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mechanics and type of prosthesis. Biomechanical considerations on the problem of clearance of hip prostheses (author's transl)].
    Jäger M; Ungethüm M
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1976 May; 118(22):693-700. PubMed ID: 818552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The biomechanics of total joint replacement surgery.
    Chao EY
    Geriatrics; 1976 Mar; 31(3):48-57. PubMed ID: 1248748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
    Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head.
    Freeman MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1978; (134):19-24. PubMed ID: 729243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of femoral prosthesis design on cement strain in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Peters CL; Bachus KN; Craig MA; Higginbotham TO
    J Arthroplasty; 2001 Feb; 16(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 11222897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.