These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7156159)

  • 1. Masticatory function and histogenesis of the middle and upper face in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Oyen OJ
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 101():559-68. PubMed ID: 7156159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates.
    Hylander WL; Picq PG; Johnson KR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Sep; 86(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 1951658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Penin X; Berge C; Baylac M
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 May; 118(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 11953945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Angles of the base of the skull in chimpanzees].
    Deblock R; Fenart R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1977 Jun; 61(173):183-8. PubMed ID: 614060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Craniofacial morphology and growth in the ferret: effects from alteration of masticatory function.
    He T
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2004; (165):1-72. PubMed ID: 15224640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of masticatory muscle function and bite-raising on mandibular morphology in the growing rat.
    Bresin A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2001; (150):1-49. PubMed ID: 11803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial heights: evolutionary relevance of postnatal ontogeny for facial orientation and skull morphology in humans and chimpanzees.
    Bastir M; Rosas A
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Nov; 47(5):359-81. PubMed ID: 15530353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of postnatal growth of the skull of Pan troglodytes verus using lateral cephalograms.
    Arnold WH; Protsch von Zieten R; Schmidt E
    Anthropol Anz; 2003 Mar; 61(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 12712770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Ontogenic development of the surface of craniofacial sagittal angular sectors in man and chimpanzee].
    Fenart R; Deblock R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1978 Mar; 62(176):85-8. PubMed ID: 728633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo function of the craniofacial haft: the interorbital "pillar".
    Ross CF
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Oct; 116(2):108-39. PubMed ID: 11590585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes.
    Mitteroecker P; Gunz P; Bookstein FL
    Evol Dev; 2005; 7(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 15876197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing of ectocranial suture activity in Pan troglodytes as related to cranial volume and dental eruption.
    Cray J; Mooney MP; Siegel MI
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2010 Aug; 293(8):1289-96. PubMed ID: 20665807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revisiting the developmental stage and age-at-death of the "Mrs. Ples" (Sts 5) and Sts 14 specimens from Sterkfontein (South Africa): do they belong to the same individual?
    BonmatĂ­ A; Arsuaga JL; Lorenzo C
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2008 Dec; 291(12):1707-22. PubMed ID: 18951512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of the mandibular first molar in the development of the supraorbital region in apes and humans.
    Hilloowala R; Trent R; Dal Pozzo G
    Anthropol Anz; 1993 Sep; 51(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 8215263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Spatial variability of some lateral cranial points in chimpanzees].
    Deblock R; Fenart R
    Bull Assoc Anat (Nancy); 1975 Jun; 59(165):383-9. PubMed ID: 1203551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Berge C; Penin X
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical and spatial determinants of Paranthropus facial form.
    McCollum MA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1994 Feb; 93(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 8147440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic responses in adult and infant monkey craniums during occlusion and mastication.
    Iwasaki K
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1989 Oct; 23(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 2640942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interspecific perspective on mechanical and nonmechanical models of primate circumorbital morphology.
    Ravosa MJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Nov; 86(3):369-96. PubMed ID: 1746644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endo's stress analysis of the primate skull and the functional significance of the supraorbital region.
    Picq PG; Hylander WL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1989 Jul; 79(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 2669503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.