These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7156955)

  • 21. "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery.
    Baumgartner H; Stefenelli T; Niederberger J; Schima H; Maurer G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 May; 33(6):1655-61. PubMed ID: 10334438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Usefulness of Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of the severity of aortic valve stenosis. Correlation with the gradients of cardiac catheterization].
    Paré Bardera JC; Bassaganyas Vilarrasa J; Serra Peñaranda A; Coll López S; Betriu Gibert A; Navarro-López F
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1986; 39 Suppl 2():36-41. PubMed ID: 3823567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal relationship between instantaneous pressure gradients and peak-to-peak systolic ejection gradient in congenital aortic stenosis.
    Boe BA; Norris MD; Zampi JD; Rocchini AP; Ensing GJ
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2017 Dec; 12(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 28703367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound.
    Stamm RB; Martin RP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 2(4):707-18. PubMed ID: 6886232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Continuous-wave Doppler for the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood velocity and rate of change of velocity: evaluation in dogs.
    Stein PD; Sabbah HN; Albert DE; Snyder JE
    Med Instrum; 1987 Jun; 21(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Doppler echocardiographic estimation of the pressure gradient in aortic stenosis. An updated assessment of the technique used in clinical practice in 249 patients.
    Schroeder AP; Egeblad H; Kristensen BO
    Cardiology; 1996; 87(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 8904684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Doppler diagnosis of valvular aortic stenosis in patients over 60 years of age.
    Agatston AS; Chengot M; Rao A; Hildner F; Samet P
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jul; 56(1):106-9. PubMed ID: 3893085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients.
    Isaaz K; Gaillard O; Cerisier A; Da Costa A; Faure E; Lamaud M; Gerenton C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):347-56. PubMed ID: 15222280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Noninvasive estimation of the left ventricular pressure waveform throughout ejection in young patients with aortic stenosis.
    Sholler GF; Colan SD; Sanders SP; Keane JF
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Aug; 12(2):492-7. PubMed ID: 3392345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis.
    Barker PC; Ensing G; Ludomirsky A; Bradley DJ; Lloyd TR; Rocchini AP
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2002 Dec; 15(12):1496-502. PubMed ID: 12464918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients.
    Currie PJ; Seward JB; Reeder GS; Vlietstra RE; Bresnahan DR; Bresnahan JF; Smith HC; Hagler DJ; Tajik AJ
    Circulation; 1985 Jun; 71(6):1162-9. PubMed ID: 3995710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L; Angelsen BA; Tromsdal A
    Br Heart J; 1980 Mar; 43(3):284-92. PubMed ID: 7437175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Correlation of the transaortic gradient determined with doppler echocardiography versus catheterization in patients with aortic stenosis].
    Illescas J; Enciso R; Vidrio M; de la Torre N; Baduí E
    Arch Inst Cardiol Mex; 1991; 61(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 1854227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound.
    Berger M; Berdoff RL; Gallerstein PE; Goldberg E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Jan; 3(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 6690544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Non-invasive estimation of the mean pressure difference in aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound.
    Teien D; Karp K; Eriksson P
    Br Heart J; 1986 Nov; 56(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 3539164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Value and limitations of Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of aortic stenosis: a statistical analysis of 70 consecutive patients.
    Panidis IP; Mintz GS; Ross J
    Am Heart J; 1986 Jul; 112(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 3524170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-invasive diagnosis and assessment of aortic valve disease and evaluation of aortic prosthesis function using echo pulsed Doppler velocimetry.
    Veyrat C; Cholot N; Abitbol G; Kalmanson D
    Br Heart J; 1980 Apr; 43(4):393-413. PubMed ID: 7397041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of the peak-to-peak pressure gradient in aortic stenosis by Doppler echocardiography.
    Zhang Y; Ihlen H; Nitter-Hauge S
    Int J Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 10(3):192-212. PubMed ID: 3957467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A fluid dynamic analysis of the development of anacrotic notch in the pressure wave in patients with semilunar valve stenosis--use of a catheter tip velocity-pressure transducer].
    Hanya S; Ishihara A; Sugawara M
    Kokyu To Junkan; 1985 Apr; 33(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 3160096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical usefulness of intravenous albunex for the Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis.
    Iwase M; Koie S; Nagasaka A; Kimura M; Hasegawa K; Matsuyama H; Nomura M; Hishida H
    Jpn Circ J; 2000 Sep; 64(9):672-8. PubMed ID: 10981851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.