These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 715828)
1. Continued use of contraception among Philippine family planning acceptors: a multivariate analysis. Phillips JF Stud Fam Plann; 1978 Jul; 9(7):182-92. PubMed ID: 715828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Continuation and effectiveness of contraceptive practice: a cross-sectional approach. Laing JE Stud Fam Plann; 1985; 16(3):138-53. PubMed ID: 3874451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A multivariate analysis of continued use of contraception among Philippine family planning acceptors. Phillips JF Popul Data Inf Serv; 1978; (4):67-8. PubMed ID: 12261336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the effects of contraceptive use on fertility: techniques and findings from the 1974 Philippine National Acceptor Survey. Laing JE Stud Fam Plann; 1978 Jun; 9(6):150-62. PubMed ID: 694975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural family planning in the Philippines. Laing JE Stud Fam Plann; 1984; 15(2):49-61. PubMed ID: 6710549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Selection of a family planning method: a Philippine example. Ballweg JA Fam Plann Resume; 1977; 1(1):188. PubMed ID: 12308789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Russia during the 1980s. Popov AA; Visser AP; Ketting E Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 8212092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the use and non use of contraception. Utomo B; Alimoeso S; Park CB Majalah Demografi Indones; 1983 Dec; 10(20):ii-19-48. PubMed ID: 12280177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of male contraceptive acceptance in rural Ghana. Lamptey P; Nicholas DD; Ofosu-Amaah S; Lourie IM Stud Fam Plann; 1978 Aug; 9(8):222-6. PubMed ID: 715833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contraceptive method switching in Peninsular Malaysia: ethnic differences, 1940s-1970s. Davanzo J; Starbird E; Reboussin D; Tan Boon Ann ; Abdullah SH Malays J Reprod Health; 1988 Jun; 6(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 12281591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors determining the choice of contraceptive methods at the Family Planning Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Konje JC; Oladini F; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OO Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Oct; 24(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 9855717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Demographic and social characteristics of family planning acceptors in Jordan. Sahawneh F Popul Bull ECWA; 1982; (22-23):119-36. PubMed ID: 12266313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metro Manila and Nueva Ecija women favor the pill. De La Cueva OS; Miranda AC Fpop Bull; 1987; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 12268886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acceptability study of the two versus three monthly injectable contraceptives. Aly FA; El-genedi MM; Toppozada HK; El-abd M; Loutfi I Dirasat Sukkaniyah; 1984; 11(69):27-39. PubMed ID: 12179796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge of family planning methods in Bangladesh, 1969-1979: trends and implications. Amin R; Mariam AG Biol Soc; 1986 Dec; 3(4):171-9. PubMed ID: 12341026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]