These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Right hemisphere superiority in the recognition of famous faces. Levine SC; Koch-Weser MP Brain Cogn; 1982 Jan; 1(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 6927549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers. Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Left and right visual field superiority for letter classification. Jonides J Q J Exp Psychol; 1979 Aug; 31(3):423-39. PubMed ID: 504547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prestimulus EEG parameters during recognition of a significant photic stimulus. Potulova LA; Korinevskii AV Neurosci Behav Physiol; 1987; 17(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 3452767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the possible dangers of using horizontal word displays in visual field studies. Bryden MP Brain Cogn; 1986 Jul; 5(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 3756008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of familial sinistrality in cerebral organization. Orsini DL; Satz P; Soper HV; Light RK Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 4000457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perception of faces by patients with localized cortical excisions. Kolb B; Milner B; Taylor L Can J Psychol; 1983 Mar; 37(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 6640441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of interstimulus and stimulus-hemisphere compatibility in the process of interhemispheric integration. Berger JM; Perret E; Zimmermann A Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Oct; 67(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 3217198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Right cerebral hemisphere superiority for constructing facial representations. Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH Neuropsychologia; 1985; 23(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 4000454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lateral specialization for recognition of words and faces in good and poor readers. Marcel T; Rajan P Neuropsychologia; 1975 Oct; 13(4):489-97. PubMed ID: 1196483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of upright and inverted faces presented in the left and right visual fields. Ellis HD; Shepherd JW Cortex; 1975 Mar; 11(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 1149464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric asymmetry for word perception: behavioral and ERP evidence. Bentin S; Feinsod M Psychophysiology; 1983 Sep; 20(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 6635088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal integration of form as a function of subject handedness and retinal locus of presentation. Christman S Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(11-12):1373-82. PubMed ID: 2615937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modes of word recognition in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Ellis AW; Young AW; Anderson C Brain Lang; 1988 Nov; 35(2):254-73. PubMed ID: 3208072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inverted writing in right- and left-handers in relation to lateralization of face recognition. Lawson NC Cortex; 1978 Jun; 14(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 679701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interference effects in the picture-word stroop task. Toma RJ; Tsao YC Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Aug; 61(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 4047882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interacting sex and familial sinistrality characteristics influence both language lateralization and spatial ability in right handers. McKeever WF; Seitz KS; Hoff AL; Marino MF; Diehl JA Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):661-8. PubMed ID: 6664485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]