These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7161128)

  • 1. Fluid dynamic stresses in the region of a porcine bioprosthetic valve.
    Sabbah HN; Stein PD
    Henry Ford Hosp Med J; 1982; 30(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 7161128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves.
    Butany J; Leask R
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress analysis of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves in vivo.
    Thubrikar MJ; Skinner JR; Eppink RT; Nolan SP
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Nov; 16(6):811-26. PubMed ID: 7174710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right choice of prosthesis for patients undergoing aortic valve surgery: searching the truth.
    Elahi M; Asopa S; Khan J
    Acute Card Care; 2007; 9(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 17573580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antithrombotic therapy after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.
    Aramendi JI; Mestres CA
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 33(4):529-30. PubMed ID: 18304827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are statins effective in preventing bioprosthetic aortic valve failure? A need for a prospective, randomized trial.
    Antonini-Canterin F; Popescu BA; Zuppiroli A; Nicolosi GL
    Ital Heart J; 2004 Feb; 5(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 15086137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice of replacement valve in the elderly.
    Kobayashi Y; Eishi K; Nagata S; Nakano K; Sasako Y; Kobayashi J; Kosakai Y; Miyatake K
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 9263873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
    Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midterm results after aortic valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis aortic valve.
    Martinovic I; Everlien M; Farah I; Wittlinger T; Knez I; Greve H; Vogt P
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jul; 80(1):198-203. PubMed ID: 15975367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Degeneration of bioprosthetic heart valve cusp and wall tissues is initiated during tissue preparation: an ultrastructural study.
    Simionescu DT; Lovekamp JJ; Vyavahare NR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 12701796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
    Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A temporarily stented, autologous pericardial aortic valve prosthesis.
    Goetz WA; Lim HS; Lansac E; Weber PA; Duran CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 12358407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inhibition of cusp and aortic wall calcification in ethanol- and aluminum-treated bioprosthetic heart valves in sheep: background, mechanisms, and synergism.
    Levy RJ; Vyavahare N; Ogle M; Ashworth P; Bianco R; Schoen FJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):209-16; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 12701794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.