These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7161286)

  • 1. In vitro closing behaviour of Björk-Shiley, St Jude and Hancock heart valve prostheses in relation to the in vivo recorded aortic valve closure.
    van Steenhoven AA; van Duppen TJ; Cauwenberg JW; van Renterghem RJ
    J Biomech; 1982; 15(11):841-8. PubMed ID: 7161286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses].
    Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamic characteristics.
    Gray RJ; Chaux A; Matloff JM; DeRobertis M; Raymond M; Stewart M; Yoganathan A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 3(2 Pt 1):321-7. PubMed ID: 6693620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel pulse duplicator system: evaluation of different valve prostheses.
    Haaf P; Steiner M; Attmann T; Pfister G; Cremer J; Lutter G
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Feb; 57(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19169990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
    Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography.
    Panidis IP; Ross J; Mintz GS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Aug; 8(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 2942593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement].
    Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F
    Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves.
    Baumgartner H; Khan S; DeRobertis M; Czer L; Maurer G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 1531058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Doppler hemodynamic characteristics of four widely used aortic valve prostheses.
    Masotti C; De Castro C; Aquilina M; Bonfranceschi P; Rusticali F
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 1990 Nov; 38(11):461-71. PubMed ID: 2093848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo cinematographic analysis of behavior of the aortic valve.
    Van Steenhoven AA; Verlaan CW; Veenstra PC; Reneman RS
    Am J Physiol; 1981 Feb; 240(2):H286-92. PubMed ID: 7468822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Björk-Shiley prosthetic values.
    Sagar KB; Wann LS; Paulsen WH; Romhilt DW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Mar; 7(3):681-7. PubMed ID: 3950245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Velocity fields and turbulent stresses downstream of biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses implanted in pigs.
    Hasenkam JM; Pedersen EM; Ostergaard JH; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Johannsen G; Schurizek BA
    Cardiovasc Res; 1988 Jul; 22(7):472-83. PubMed ID: 3252971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Six month postoperative hemodynamics of the Hancock heterograft and the Björk-Shiley prosthesis: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative prospective randomized trial.
    Khuri SF; Folland ED; Sethi GK; Souchek J; Oprian C; Wong M; Burchfiel C; Henderson WG; Hammermeister KE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jul; 12(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 3288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Non-invasive determination of pressure gradients of heart valve prostheses using Doppler ultrasound].
    Hoffmann A; Amann FW; Grädel E; Burckhardt D
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1982 Nov; 112(45):1600-3. PubMed ID: 7156956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of the amount of backflow produced by four types of aortic valve prostheses.
    Sabbah HN; Stein PD
    J Biomech Eng; 1984 Feb; 106(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 6727316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics.
    Yoganathan AP; Chaux A; Gray RJ; Woo YR; DeRobertis M; Williams FP; Matloff JM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 3(2 Pt 1):313-20. PubMed ID: 6693619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.
    Williams GA; Labovitz AJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performance by magnetic resonance velocity imaging.
    Botnar R; Nagel E; Scheidegger MB; Pedersen EM; Hess O; Boesiger P
    MAGMA; 2000 Feb; 10(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 10697222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position].
    Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C
    Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.