These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7162941)

  • 21. Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception.
    Werker JF; Logan JS
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jan; 37(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3991316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Average spectrum and identification of vowel-like stimuli.
    Malinnikova TG; Chistovich LA
    Hum Physiol; 1985; 11(3):160-4. PubMed ID: 4093142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Categorical perception as a function of stimulus quality.
    van Hessen AJ; Schouten ME
    Phonetica; 1999; 56(1-2):56-72. PubMed ID: 10450076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the nature of rate-dependent processing during phonetic perception.
    Miller JL; Aibel IL; Green K
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Jan; 35(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 6709475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech acceptability.
    Ellis LW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):625-30. PubMed ID: 10483655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A note on hidden factors in vowel perception experiments.
    Traunmüller H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):2015-9. PubMed ID: 2262639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perception of speech rate of Dutch and Italian utterances.
    den Os E
    Phonetica; 1985; 42(2-3):124-34. PubMed ID: 4095163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.
    Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 2345691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Against a role of "chirp" identification in duplex perception.
    Repp BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Jan; 35(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 6709478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception.
    Green KP; Miller JL
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Sep; 38(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 4088819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of speech sounds with alternate formants presented to opposite ears.
    Ainsworth WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 May; 63(5):1528-34. PubMed ID: 690332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Possible mechanisms of duplex perception: "chirp" identification versus dichotic fusion.
    Nusbaum HC
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Jan; 35(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 6709479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [New approach to determining the phonetic similarity of stimuli and its testing in an automated experiment].
    Chistovich LA; Chikhman VN; Ogorodnikova EA
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 May; 67(5):704-11. PubMed ID: 7286306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Training non-native speech contrasts in adults: acquisition of the English /delta/-/theta/ contrast by francophones.
    Jamieson DG; Morosan DE
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Oct; 40(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 3580034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention modulates auditory adaptation produced by amplitude modulation.
    Kawashima T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL123-7. PubMed ID: 19894786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The selective adaptation effects of burst-cued stops.
    Ganong WF
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Jul; 24(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 693243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Summerfield Q; Wood EJ; Fernandes MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):740-52. PubMed ID: 7130532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency.
    Cutler A; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Mar; 29(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 7267273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: effects of subsequent context.
    Bard EG; Shillcock RC; Altmann GT
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Nov; 44(5):395-408. PubMed ID: 3226889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Single format contrast in vowel identification.
    Crowder RG; Repp BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Apr; 35(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6739272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.