These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7163761)

  • 1. Bilaterally recorded auditory brainstem responses to monaural stimulation. Latency and amplitude differences in normal subjects.
    Rosenhamer H; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 7163761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of auditory brainstem response waveforms derived ipsilaterally and contralaterally to monaural stimulation.
    Kato T; Shiraishi K; Imamura A; Kimura K; Morizono T; Soda T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1995; 22(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 7487680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will contralateral white noise interfere with the monaurally click-evoked brainstem response?
    Rosenhamer H; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 6844866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study of auditory middle latency responses in relation to electrode combinations and stimulus conditions.
    Kadobayashi I; Kira Y; Toyoshima A; Nishijima H
    Audiology; 1984; 23(5):509-19. PubMed ID: 6487148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latencies of ABR (waves III and V) to binaural clicks: effects of interaural time and intensity differences.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Holmkvist C
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 6648317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latency and amplitude effects of electrode placement on the early auditory evoked response.
    Beattie RC; Beguwala FE; Mills DM; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 Feb; 51(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 3945061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ipsilateral and contralateral recordings of auditory brainstem responses to monaural stimulation.
    Hatanaka T; Shuto H; Yasuhara A; Kobayashi Y
    Pediatr Neurol; 1988; 4(6):354-7. PubMed ID: 3245873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis. I. The variability of the normal response.
    Rosenhamer HJ; Lindström B; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):193-205. PubMed ID: 756085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Isochronic mapping of the auditory brainstem response: normative results.
    Phillips AJ; Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Dec; 29(6):335-46. PubMed ID: 8861409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brain stem auditory-evoked potentials of dogs: wave forms and effects of recording electrode positions.
    Holliday TA; Te Selle ME
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Apr; 46(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 4014834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction of click polarity, stimulus level, and repetition rate on the auditory brainstem response.
    Beattie RC
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 3187380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maturation of the contralaterally recorded auditory brain stem response.
    Stapells DR; Mosseri M
    Ear Hear; 1991 Jun; 12(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 1916040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neonatal auditory brain stem responses from ipsilateral and contralateral recording montages.
    Edwards CG; Durieux-Smith A; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(4):175-8. PubMed ID: 4043570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multichannel waveforms and topographic mapping of the auditory brainstem response under common stimulus and recording conditions.
    Norrix LW; Glattke TJ
    J Commun Disord; 1996; 29(3):157-82. PubMed ID: 8799852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative Erb's Point-Vertex recording increases brainstem auditory evoked potential wave V amplitude.
    Greve T; Beyer F; Szelényi A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Feb; 131(2):420-424. PubMed ID: 31881448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simultaneous recording of auditory evoked potentials. Relationships among the fast, middle and long latency components.
    Arslan E; Prosser S; Michelini S
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 6463555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory-evoked response in the clinically normal dog: early latency components.
    Sims MH; Moore RE
    Am J Vet Res; 1984 Oct; 45(10):2019-27. PubMed ID: 6497099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: evidence and mechanisms.
    Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 16439078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.