These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7164849)

  • 1. Physical and name match processes in same-different judgments for letters.
    Kirsner K; Wells JE; Sang DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Nov; 52(1-2):73-85. PubMed ID: 7164849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What does naming a picture do? Effects of prior picture naming on recognition of identical and same-name alternatives.
    Warren LR; Horn JW
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Mar; 10(2):167-5. PubMed ID: 7087780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual persistence and code selection in short-term memory for letters.
    Kirsner K; Sang DL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):260-76. PubMed ID: 528938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal-mirrored letter recognition, same-different judgment and cerebral dominance.
    Shimizu A; Endo M
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1982; 36(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 7095668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are nominal same-different matches slower due to differences in level of processing or to response competition?
    Eriksen CW; O'Hara WP
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 7155779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthographic and lexical processing of visual letter strings.
    Marmurek HH; Briscoe G
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):368-87. PubMed ID: 7172127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric differences in picture--word interference.
    Wuillemin DB; Krane RV; Richardson BL
    Brain Lang; 1982 May; 16(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 7104676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and acoustic processing in making same-different judgments.
    Yaworsky KB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):499-504. PubMed ID: 6866659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phasic alertness and differences in picture encoding speed.
    Merrill EC; McCauley C
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 3228517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More about the letter-frequency effect.
    Mason M
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of backward masking on same-different judgments.
    Krueger LE
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 3588235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonological coding in good and poor readers.
    Briggs P; Underwood G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1982 Aug; 34(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 7119682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Same-different judgments under high speed stress: missing-feature principle predominates in early processing.
    Krueger LE; Chignell MH
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Aug; 38(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 4088809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of spatial arrangement of letter pairs in a name-matching task with unilateral and bilateral hemifield stimulation.
    Schmitz-Gielsdorf J; Willmes K; Vondenhoff C; Hartje W
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 3405402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acquisition of rapid reading responses.
    Doehring DG
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1976; 41(2):1-54. PubMed ID: 1004512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.
    Johnson NF
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3763365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 May; 41(5):419-34. PubMed ID: 3601624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of lowercase letters in peripheral vision: a discrimination matrix based on saccade latencies.
    Jacobs AM; Nazir TA; Heller O
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 2755768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nominal and physical decision criteria in same-different judgments.
    Eviatar Z; Zaidel E; Wickens T
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Jul; 56(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 8084733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.