These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7167339)

  • 1. Letter identification in words and non-words, with variation in visual angle and delay of position cue.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1982; 11(3):305-17. PubMed ID: 7167339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking.
    Fine EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 78(11):831-8. PubMed ID: 11763257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word length and visual-noise texture in backward masking.
    Zamansky HS; Corwin TR
    Perception; 1976; 5(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 951170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representation of letters when mislocation errors occur.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2366047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus orientation and the first-letter advantage.
    Scaltritti M; Dufau S; Grainger J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():37-42. PubMed ID: 29306099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition.
    Stevens M; Grainger J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jan; 65(1):133-51. PubMed ID: 12699316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The word superiority effect overcomes crowding.
    Cutler J; Bodet A; Rivest J; Cavanagh P
    Vision Res; 2024 Sep; 222():108436. PubMed ID: 38820621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The word-superiority effect does not require a T-scope.
    Prinzmetal W
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):473-84. PubMed ID: 1594437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus duration and inter-letter spacing on letter-in-string identification.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():49-55. PubMed ID: 24486806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 528895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of words and letters within words.
    Johnson NF; Marmurek HH
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage.
    Scaltritti M; Balota DA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Oct; 144(2):397-410. PubMed ID: 24012723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word superiority over isolated letters: the neglected case of forward masking.
    Jordan TR; Bevan KM
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8035690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision.
    Chanceaux M; Grainger J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 22964055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A visual processing but no phonological disorder in a child with mixed dyslexia.
    Valdois S; Bidet-Ildei C; Lassus-Sangosse D; Reilhac C; N'guyen-Morel MA; Guinet E; Orliaguet JP
    Cortex; 2011; 47(10):1197-218. PubMed ID: 21704984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Familiarity affects visual processing of words.
    Pollatsek A; Well AD; Schindler RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 1185120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tilted letters and tilted words: a possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition.
    Driver J; Baylis GC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 7476242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.