BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7167349)

  • 1. Electrocutaneous stimulation I. The effects of stimulus parameters on absolute threshold.
    Girvin JP; Marks LE; Antunes JL; Quest DO; O'Keefe MD; Ning P; Dobelle WH
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):524-8. PubMed ID: 7167349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrocutaneous stimulation III. The perception of temporal order.
    Marks LE; Girvin JP; O'Keefe MD; Ning P; Quest DO; Antunes JL; Dobelle WH
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 7167351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrocutaneous stimulation II. The estimation of distance between two points.
    Marks LE; Girvin JP; Quest DO; Antunes JL; Ning P; O'Keefe MD; Dobelle WH
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 7167350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in sensitivity to transient electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Larkin WD; Reilly JP; Kittler LB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 May; 33(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 3710505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensory detection thresholds are modulated across the cardiac cycle: evidence that cutaneous sensibility is greatest for systolic stimulation.
    Edwards L; Ring C; McIntyre D; Winer JB; Martin U
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Mar; 46(2):252-6. PubMed ID: 19207192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrocutaneous sensitivity: effects of skin temperature.
    Larkin WD; Reilly JP
    Somatosens Res; 1986; 3(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 3749663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal and spatial integration for electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Higashiyama A; Tashiro T
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 May; 33(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 6877989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cutaneous sensory threshold stimulation with high frequency square-wave current. I. The relationship of electrode dimensions to the sensory threshold.
    SIGEL H
    J Invest Dermatol; 1952 Jun; 18(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 14938660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at threshold: the effects of electrode size.
    Higashiyama A; Tashiro T
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 2243763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
    Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1982; 10(4):175-92. PubMed ID: 7171152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrocutaneous spatial integration at suprathreshold levels: an additive neural model.
    Higashiyama A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):912-23. PubMed ID: 8409866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrocutaneous nerve stimulation-II: stimulus waveform selection.
    Bütikofer R; Lawrence PD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1979 Feb; 26(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 761934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of training on human tracking of electrocutaneous signals.
    Szeto AY; Chung YM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 3752640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perception threshold measurement can be a useful tool for evaluation of sensitive skin.
    Kim SJ; Lim SU; Won YH; An SS; Lee EY; Moon SJ; Kim J
    Int J Cosmet Sci; 2008 Oct; 30(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 18822038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Localization of electrocutaneous stimuli on the fingers and forearm: effects of electrode configuration and body axis.
    Higashiyama A; Hayashi M
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8351181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.