These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7167349)

  • 21. Electrocutaneous pain thresholds in humans to low frequency square-wave pulses.
    Plutchik R; Bender H
    J Psychol; 1966 Mar; 62(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 5938492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.
    Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Radwin RG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):701-15. PubMed ID: 1516937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effects of pulse height and pulse width on the magnitude sensation of electrocutaneous stimulus (author's transl)].
    Tachi S; Tanie K; Abe M
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1977 Sep; 15(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 592546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Magnitude estimation of short electrocutaneous pulses.
    Babkoff H
    Psychol Res; 1976 Oct; 39(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1005627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability and interjudgment predictability of subjective judgments of electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Tursky B; O'Connell D
    Psychophysiology; 1972 May; 9(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 5034117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
    Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of percutaneous stimulation on motor unit firing behavior in man.
    Masakado Y; Kamen G; De Luca CJ
    Exp Brain Res; 1991; 86(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 1756816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering.
    Szeto AY; Saunders FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr; 29(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 7068167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The perceptual properties of electrocutaneous stimulation: sensory quality, subjective intensity, and intensity-duration relation.
    Tashiro T; Higashiyama A
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Dec; 30(6):579-86. PubMed ID: 7335455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrotactile adaptation on the abdomen: preliminary results.
    Kaczmarek KA
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Dec; 8(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 11204041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Electrical sensimetry. Assessment of cutaneous sensibility with electrical stimulation.
    Laitinen LV
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 1987; 89(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 3568522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cutaneous sensory threshold stimulation with high frequency square-wave current. II. The relationship of body site and of skin diseases to the sensory threshold.
    SIGEL H
    J Invest Dermatol; 1952 Jun; 18(6):447-51. PubMed ID: 14938661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electrocutaneous feedback for artificial limbs. Summary progress report. February 1, 1974, through July 31, 1975.
    Prior RE; Lyman J
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):3-37. PubMed ID: 1227686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The movement-induced modulation in discriminability between cutaneous nonpainful stimuli depends on test stimulus intensity.
    Pertovaara A; Helminen RR; Mansikka H
    Exp Brain Res; 1994; 101(3):506-12. PubMed ID: 7851517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Effect of angiotensin II and naloxone on the nociceptive sensitivity of rabbits undergoing electrostimulation of the skin and dental pulp].
    Raevskaia OS; Fedoseeva OV
    Farmakol Toksikol; 1988; 51(5):23-7. PubMed ID: 3208882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patients with irritable bowel syndrome have greater pain tolerance than normal subjects.
    Cook IJ; van Eeden A; Collins SM
    Gastroenterology; 1987 Oct; 93(4):727-33. PubMed ID: 3623019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Attempted electrocutaneous speech transmission].
    Breiner HL
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1968; 15(1):1-48. PubMed ID: 5712605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Partial masking in electrocutaneous sensation: a model for sensation matching, with applications to loudness recruitment.
    Larkin WD; Penner MJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Sep; 46(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 2771612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison in young healthy volunteers of 3 different parameters of constant current stimulation used to determine sensory thresholds in the lower urinary tract.
    Wyndaele JJ; Van Eetvelde B; Callens D
    J Urol; 1996 Oct; 156(4):1415-7. PubMed ID: 8808885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.