These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7167358)

  • 1. The effect of flanking context on visual classification: the joint contribution of interactions at different processing levels.
    Flowers JH; Wilcox N
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):581-91. PubMed ID: 7167358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing times for English and Chinese words.
    Hoosain R; Osgood CE
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 6664815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are nominal same-different matches slower due to differences in level of processing or to response competition?
    Eriksen CW; O'Hara WP
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 7155779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing context: Asymmetric interference of visual form and texture in object and scene interactions.
    Lowe MX; Ferber S; Cant JS
    Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():34-40. PubMed ID: 26499389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The time to name disoriented natural objects.
    Jolicoeur P
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Jul; 13(4):289-303. PubMed ID: 4079746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Priming effects in perceptual classification.
    Flowers JH
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 2304812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More about the letter-frequency effect.
    Mason M
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are letter codes always activated?
    Greenberg SN
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Oct; 44(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 3226880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The interfering effect of word perception on letter identification.
    Lawry JA
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Dec; 28(6):577-88. PubMed ID: 7208274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?
    Taft M
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):465-74. PubMed ID: 7176907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of letter orientation and sequential redundancy on the speed of letter search.
    Greenberg SN; Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):181-91. PubMed ID: 6865752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures.
    Maki RH
    Can J Psychol; 1986 Dec; 40(4):368-87. PubMed ID: 3502879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A response-selection basis for the mixed-category, repeated-stimulus inferiority effect.
    Proctor RW; Fober GW
    Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 3405745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Memory code for verbally and film-presented action sequences].
    Riff B; Vanecek E
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1986; 138(3):185-99. PubMed ID: 3579546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated.
    Lewicki P; Hill T; Bizot E
    Cogn Psychol; 1988 Jan; 20(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 3338266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal information is not sufficient to produce semantic or visual priming.
    Paap KR; Newsome SL
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 May; 29(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 7279572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planning speech: a picture's words worth.
    Cooper WE; Soares C; Reagan RT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1985 Feb; 58(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 3984774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Priming is not necessary for selective-attention failures: semantic effects of unattended, unprimed letters.
    Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 May; 41(5):419-34. PubMed ID: 3601624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acquisition of rapid reading responses.
    Doehring DG
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1976; 41(2):1-54. PubMed ID: 1004512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.