These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. An assessment of the anticompetitive effects of preferred provider organizations. Greaney TL; Sindelar JL Inquiry; 1987; 24(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 2961699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. More private, less government PPA antitrust action. Burda D Hospitals; 1987 Feb; 61(3):52. PubMed ID: 3804258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Preferred provider organizations, price-fixing and Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Bluhm RJ Health Matrix; 1987; 5(3):9-16. PubMed ID: 10285386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The legal framework for effective competition. Berenson RA; Hastings DA; Kopit WG Baxter Health Policy Rev; 1996; 2():235-65. PubMed ID: 11066262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Vertical restraints and powerful health insurers: exclusionary conduct masquerading as managed care? Miller FH Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):195-236. PubMed ID: 10295963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The preferred provider organization -- pro-competitive alternative or antitrust problem? Enders RJ Hosp Forum; 1982; 25(6):42-4. PubMed ID: 10257108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Alternative delivery systems are focus of antitrust scrutiny. Scammon DL; Fuller DA; Sheffet MJ J Health Care Mark; 1987 Jun; 7(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10282715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Peer review of fees by physician groups: antitrust issues. Scott M Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(14):5-8. PubMed ID: 10277308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Antitrust implications of health planning: National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas City. Chase JB Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):321-48. PubMed ID: 7168454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Antitrust implications of allied health practitioner privilege decisions and hospital-physician exclusive contracts. Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10289814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Court dismisses antitrust violation claim. Chandler JA Health Law Vigil; 1985 Aug; 8(17):6. PubMed ID: 10324433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The antitrust swamp: how can healthcare professionals avoid it? Weller CD Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):26-8, 30-6. PubMed ID: 10315211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Medical care collection or recovery. Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1999 Apr; 64(80):22675-83. PubMed ID: 10558484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Antitrust implications of medical technology assessment. Rose M; Leibenluft RF N Engl J Med; 1986 Jun; 314(23):1490-3. PubMed ID: 3702964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. How antitrust laws are changing the health care industry. Rosenfield RH; Harwell JD Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Jul; 3(7):4-10. PubMed ID: 10271815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]