These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7168707)

  • 1. Peer review and the law.
    Cahill W
    Aust Clin Rev; 1982 Jun; (5):4-6. PubMed ID: 7168707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review and the law.
    Aust Clin Rev; 1984 Mar; (11):23-9. PubMed ID: 6487150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protection from discovery of hospital peer review committee records.
    Peterson RN
    Hosp Med Staff; 1984 Jul; 13(7):6-12. PubMed ID: 10267927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wyoming court interprets state peer review shield law.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 May; 6(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10294155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legal issues arising from peer review processes.
    Thomson C
    Aust Health Rev; 1986; 9(3):258-69. PubMed ID: 10279574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Legal access to patient health records/protection of quality assurance activities.
    Feehan KP
    Health Law Can; 1991; 12(1):3-10, 31. PubMed ID: 10114435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laws vary on use of peer review records in litigation.
    Berliner MC
    Provider; 1987 May; 13(5):44, 46. PubMed ID: 10281935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidentiality of peer review.
    Battaglia VF
    Del Med J; 1999 Mar; 71(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 10208062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2003 Schwartz Award. Pitfalls of peer review. The limited protections of state and federal peer review law for physicians.
    Nijm LM
    J Leg Med; 2003 Dec; 24(4):541-56. PubMed ID: 14660324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Legal issues concerning peer review documents.
    Dunn LJ; Holbrook RF
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 10252576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Legal issues in peer review for self-insured employers.
    Ragsdale JC
    Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):409-10. PubMed ID: 4073393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antitrust law and peer review remain at odds.
    Riffer J
    Hospitals; 1986 Feb; 60(3):58. PubMed ID: 3753695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Freedom of information--the Victorian experience.
    Nye A
    Aust Clin Rev; 1984 Sep; (14):39-42. PubMed ID: 6517757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The latest word on confidentiality of peer review.
    Cronan CJ
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1998 Dec; 96(12):491-3. PubMed ID: 9879179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discoverability and admissibility of medical staff committee records: a state-by-state analysis.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10252569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. VA hospital documents sought: suit threatens peer review privacy.
    Am Med News; 1979 Dec; 22(47):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10244813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review records: Canadian laws must be updated.
    Ferguson CG
    Dimens Health Serv; 1985; 62(9):16. PubMed ID: 4076627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review confidentiality survives legal challenge.
    Murphy JF
    Ir Med J; 2008 May; 101(5):132. PubMed ID: 18624255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: a secret affair?
    Dunn LJ
    Trustee; 1978 Apr; 31(4):9-11, 13. PubMed ID: 10307158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Law on medical confidentiality as it relates to medical audit.
    Aust Clin Rev; 1982 Jun; (5)(5):2-3. PubMed ID: 11653642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.