149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7169710)
1. [Effects of change-over-delay in the signal-key procedure].
Manabe K; Kawashima T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1982 Dec; 53(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 7169710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.
Allan RW; Matthews TJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 1774537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response-cost punishment via token loss with pigeons.
Pietras CJ; Hackenberg TD
Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 15896532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the form of stimulus generalization curves for visual intensity.
Ernst AJ; Engberg L; Thomas DR
J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Sep; 16(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 5121854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signals, resistance to change, and conditioned reinforcement in a multiple schedule.
Bell MC; Gomez BE; Kessler K
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 18355988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of intruded events on peak time: the role of reinforcement history during the intruded event.
Aum S; Brown BL; Hemmes NS
Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 17157998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of contingent auditory stimuli on concurrent schedule performance: an alternative punisher to electric shock.
Reed P; Yoshino T
Behav Processes; 2008 Jul; 78(3):421-8. PubMed ID: 18406078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control.
Powell RW
J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jul; 16(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 5142390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning.
Rilling M; Caplan HJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Jan; 23(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 1167899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contextual determinants of temporal control: Behavioral contrast in a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
da Silva SP; Lattal KA
Behav Processes; 2006 Feb; 71(2-3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16364564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extinguished operant responding shows stimulus specificity.
McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 14998658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of partial reinforcement and time between reinforced trials on terminal response rate in pigeon autoshaping.
Gottlieb DA
Behav Processes; 2006 Mar; 72(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 16413974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential resurgence and response elimination.
Doughty AH; da Silva SP; Lattal KA
Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 17395402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of variable-interval value and amount of training on stimulus generalization.
Walker DJ; Branch MN
J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Sep; 70(2):139-63. PubMed ID: 9768505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum.
Nevin JA
J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 May; 57(3):301-16. PubMed ID: 1602269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
Lattal KA; Gleeson S
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 2303791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of timing and classical conditioning.
Holder MD; Roberts S
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1985 Apr; 11(2):172-93. PubMed ID: 4009120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination between outcomes in instrumental learning: effects of preexposure to the reinforcers.
Blair CA; Blundell P; Galtress T; Hall G; Killcross S
Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 12881161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responses eliminated by noncontingent or negatively contingent reinforcement recover in extinction.
Lindblom LL; Jenkins HM
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):175-90. PubMed ID: 7241053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
