These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7171152)

  • 1. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1982; 10(4):175-92. PubMed ID: 7171152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of training on human tracking of electrocutaneous signals.
    Szeto AY; Chung YM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 3752640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Petrini L; Jensen W
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):297-308. PubMed ID: 22773530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering.
    Szeto AY; Saunders FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr; 29(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 7068167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.
    Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Bach-y-Rita P; Tompkins WJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Jan; 38(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 2026426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1985; 13(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 4073624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of single electrode tactile codes.
    Szeto AY; Farrenkopf GR
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(6):647-65. PubMed ID: 1449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixed-Modality Stimulation to Evoke Two Modalities Simultaneously in One Channel for Electrocutaneous Sensory Feedback.
    Choi K; Kim P; Kim KS; Kim S
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Dec; 25(12):2258-2269. PubMed ID: 28742043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived locus and intensity of electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Higashiyama A; Rollman GB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Jul; 38(7):679-86. PubMed ID: 1879861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Geng B; Yoshida K; Jensen W
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 8():9. PubMed ID: 21306616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of the stimulation frequency on closed-loop control with electrotactile feedback.
    Paredes LP; Dosen S; Rattay F; Graimann B; Farina D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 12():35. PubMed ID: 25889752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensity Discriminability of Electrocutaneous and Intraneural Stimulation Pulse Frequency in Intact Individuals and Amputees.
    George JA; Brinton MR; Colgan PC; Colvin GK; Bensmaia SJ; Clark GA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():3893-3896. PubMed ID: 33018851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
    Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrotactile two-point discrimination as a function of frequency, body site, laterality, and stimulation codes.
    Solomonow M; Lyman J; Freedy A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1977 Mar; 5(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 851263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information transmission across the skin: high-resolution tactile sensory aids for the deaf and the blind.
    Saunders FA
    Int J Neurosci; 1983 May; 19(1-4):21-8. PubMed ID: 6874253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysical studies relevant to the design of a digital electrotactile speech processor.
    Blamey PJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 2957405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of frequency change on discrimination of pulse bursts in an electrocutaneous tactual vocoder.
    Bull D; Eilers RE; Oller DK; Mandalia BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1192-8. PubMed ID: 3156905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.