These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7171697)

  • 1. Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation.
    Conover WJ; Iman RL
    Biometrics; 1982 Sep; 38(3):715-24. PubMed ID: 7171697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric analysis of covariance for comparing change in randomized studies with baseline values subject to error.
    Knoke JD
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):523-33. PubMed ID: 1912259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Type I error robustness of ANOVA and ANOVA on ranks when the number of treatments is large.
    Brownie C; Boos DD
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):542-9. PubMed ID: 19405210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power comparison of robust approximate and non-parametric tests for the analysis of cross-over trials.
    Correa JA; Bellavance F
    Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(8):1185-96. PubMed ID: 11304735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
    MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing hypotheses about interclass correlations from familial data.
    Konishi S
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 4005373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tests of independence for bivariate survival data.
    Shih JH; Louis TA
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1440-9. PubMed ID: 8962462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial sign preprocessing: a simple way to impart moderate robustness to multivariate estimators.
    Serneels S; De Nolf E; Van Espen PJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1402-9. PubMed ID: 16711760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for heterogeneity among phenotypic correlations: a comparison of methods using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Brown RP
    Genetica; 1997 Sep; 101(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 16220248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A strategy to evaluate a covariate by group interaction in an analysis of covariance.
    Leon AC; Portera L; Lowell K; Rheinheimer D
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1998; 34(4):805-9. PubMed ID: 10513456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Planning research studies: an alternative to power analysis.
    Cobb EB
    Nurs Res; 1985; 34(6):386-8. PubMed ID: 3852253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate analysis of variance test for gene set analysis.
    Tsai CA; Chen JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 25(7):897-903. PubMed ID: 19254923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fully parametric and semi-parametric regression models for common events with covariate measurement error in main study/validation study designs.
    Spiegelman D; Casella M
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):395-409. PubMed ID: 9192443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An affine invariant rank-based method for comparing dependent groups.
    Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):33-42. PubMed ID: 15969837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.