These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7171933)

  • 1. Physical characteristics of four roentgenographic chains proposed for chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Pitkänen M; Wiljasalo M
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):891-6. PubMed ID: 7171933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual detection and physical characteristics of roentgenographic systems. Investigations on chest imaging chains.
    Manninen H; Pitkänen M; Wiljasalo M; Wiljasalo S; Soimakallio S
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 6507138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Large-screen image intensifier photofluorography compared with full-size screen-film technique in chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Rytkönen H; Soimakallio S; Terho EO; Hentunen J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(5):525-33. PubMed ID: 4072746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of different imaging chains in clinical chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Terho EO; Wiljasalo M; Wiljasalo S; Soimakallio S
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Nov; 57(683):991-5. PubMed ID: 6535626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
    Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality and patient dose for different screen-film combinations.
    Guibelalde E; Fernández JM; Vañó E; Llorca A; Ruiz MJ
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Feb; 67(794):166-73. PubMed ID: 8130979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems.
    Braun M; Wilson BC
    Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reduction of patient dose with maximum assurance of image quality].
    Kuhn H
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Jul; 38(7):224-30. PubMed ID: 4035266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique].
    Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A phantom approach to find the optimal technical parameters for plain chest radiography.
    Vassileva J
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):648-53. PubMed ID: 15326041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of rare earth screen/film combinations.
    Rossi RP; Hendee WR; Ahrens CR
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 981629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.