These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7172134)

  • 1. Some suffix effects on lipread lists.
    Campbell R; Dodd B
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):508-14. PubMed ID: 7172134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
    Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Further evidence of interference between lipreading and auditory recency.
    Gardiner JM; Gathercole SE; Gregg VH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1983 Apr; 9(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 6222148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
    Lowenstein JH; Cribb C; Shell P; Yuan Y; Nittrouer S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():276-294. PubMed ID: 30933869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
    Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
    Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modality effects: do they fall on deaf ears?
    Engle RW; Cantor J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 May; 41(2):273-92. PubMed ID: 2748932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suffix effects and probe modality in probed recall: implications for readout from sensory memory.
    Penney CG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1982 May; 34(Pt 2):245-57. PubMed ID: 7202243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: further support for the changing state hypothesis.
    Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):143-60. PubMed ID: 8177959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate memory in the orally trained deaf: effects of 'lipreadability' in the recall of written syllables.
    Campbell R; Wright H
    Br J Psychol; 1989 Aug; 80 ( Pt 3)():299-312. PubMed ID: 2790390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do you see what you are hearing? Cross-modal effects of speech sounds on lipreading.
    Baart M; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Mar; 471(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 20080146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding sound to lipread lists: the effects on serial recall of adding an auditory pulse train and a pure tone to silently lipread lists.
    Campbell R; Garwood J; Rosen S
    Mem Cognit; 1988 May; 16(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 3393082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
    Morton J; Chambers SM
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate serial recall of mixed-modality lists.
    Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Mar; 15(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 2522515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
    Odgers RP; Colle HA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.
    Greene RL; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 2945898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recency and suffix effects in pictures as a function of recall method.
    Manning SK; Schreier H
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 3364617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serial recall versus recall by categories in short-term memory.
    Penney CG
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Mar; 36(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 7104870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.