371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7172670)
1. American Medical Association vs. Federal Trade Commission.
Conn Med; 1982 Nov; 46(11):673-5. PubMed ID: 7172670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. AMA promises court fight over FTC ruling on advertising.
Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Dec; 7(12):23. PubMed ID: 263201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulating the regulators: the Supreme Court's turn.
Wilcox DP
Tex Med; 1981 Nov; 77(11):76-9. PubMed ID: 7323971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advertising by physicians (Federal Trade Commission attacks principles of medical ethics).
Huff JW
J Med Assoc Ga; 1976 May; 65(5):163-4. PubMed ID: 932583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The American Medical Association, et al.; prohibited trade practices, and affirmative corrective actions--Federal Trade Commission. Modifying order.
Fed Regist; 1982 Jun; 47(112):25118-20. PubMed ID: 10255447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. American Medical Association ordered to change its principles of ethics by Federal Trade Commission.
Korcok M
Can Med Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 121(11):1542-3. PubMed ID: 519586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Advertising--a test case.
World Med J; 1983; 30(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10262599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AMA, FTC end 16-year physician-advertising fight.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1991 Oct; 21(42):8. PubMed ID: 10114230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal Trade Commission issues final order against American Medical Association.
Conn Med; 1982 Oct; 46(10):601-3. PubMed ID: 7140280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Healthcare advertising: what you can and cannot say.
Barney DR
Healthspan; 1985 Jan; 2(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10271480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. American Medical Association; prohibited trade practices, and affirmative corrective actions--Federal Trade Commission. Final order.
Fed Regist; 1979 Nov; 44(218):64803-4. PubMed ID: 10244089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An FTC view on codes of ethics: the legal limits for the '80's.
Johnson EP
J Am Coll Dent; 1983; 50(l):10-3. PubMed ID: 11650668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. American Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and the New Haven County Medical Association, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. Decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit: October 7, 1980.
Conn Med; 1980 Dec; 44(12):801-6. PubMed ID: 7449374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. FTC investigates ADA.
Freistadt M
Contact Point; 1988; 66(2):12-5. PubMed ID: 3191695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Antitrust, joint ventures and the end of the AMA's contract practice ethics: new ways of thinking about the health care industry.
Weller CD
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Oct; 6(8):7-36. PubMed ID: 10268450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Federal Trade Commission sets about reducing costs of "health care industry".
Lawrence SV
Forum Med; 1979 Jan; 2(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10239722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal examination of physician advertising on the internet.
Carroll J
Facial Plast Surg; 2006 Feb; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 16732508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physician advertising.
Lober CW
Dermatol Clin; 1993 Apr; 11(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 8477539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should the FTC regulate American medicine?
Rial W
Colo Med; 1982 Nov; 79(11):363-4. PubMed ID: 7172605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are we restraining competition or human misery?
Gorney M
Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1980 Feb; 8(2):32-5. PubMed ID: 7348736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
