BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7174710)

  • 1. Stress analysis of porcine bioprosthetic heart valves in vivo.
    Thubrikar MJ; Skinner JR; Eppink RT; Nolan SP
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Nov; 16(6):811-26. PubMed ID: 7174710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Thubrikar MJ; Deck JD; Aouad J; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jul; 86(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6865456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stresses of natural versus prosthetic aortic valve leaflets in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Piepgrass WC; Deck JD; Nolan SP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1980 Sep; 30(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 7425702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of the design and dynamics of aortic bioprostheses in vivo.
    Thubrikar M; Skinner JR; Aouad J; Finkelmeier BA; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Aug; 84(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 7098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of the Medtronic Intact bioprosthetic valve. Effects of "zero-pressure" fixation.
    Vesely I
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 1986174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic simulation pericardial bioprosthetic heart valve function.
    Kim H; Lu J; Sacks MS; Chandran KB
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Oct; 128(5):717-24. PubMed ID: 16995758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of transcatheter aortic valve degeneration.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Jaussaud N; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 Aug; 9(2):301-8. PubMed ID: 19414489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the in vivo and in vitro mechanical properties of aortic valve leaflets.
    Thubrikar MJ; Aouad J; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jul; 92(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 3724225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is zero-pressure fixation of bioprosthetic valves truly stress free?
    Vesely I; Lozon A; Talman E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Aug; 106(2):288-98. PubMed ID: 8341070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer modelling of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Christie GW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S95-100; discussion S101. PubMed ID: 1389288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An optimal mounting frame to reduce flexural stresses of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Vesely I; Krucinski S; Dokainish MA; Campbell G
    ASAIO J; 1994; 40(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 8003759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in the aortic valve affect leaflet stress distributions: implications for aortic valve degeneration.
    Singh R; Strom JA; Ondrovic L; Joseph B; VanAuker MD
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 May; 17(3):290-8; discussion 299. PubMed ID: 18592926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anisotropic elasticity and strength of glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardium for use in pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
    Zioupos P; Barbenel JC; Fisher J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jan; 28(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 8126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tissue engineering of cardiac valve prostheses II: biomechanical characterization of decellularized porcine aortic heart valves.
    Korossis SA; Booth C; Wilcox HE; Watterson KG; Kearney JN; Fisher J; Ingham E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 12150291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frame-mounted porcine valve bioprostheses: preparation during aortic-root dilation. Biomechanics and design considerations.
    Butterfield M; Fisher J; Lockie KJ; Davies GA; Watterson K
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Dec; 106(6):1181-8. PubMed ID: 8246557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro calcification of pericardial bioprostheses.
    Glasmacher B; Reul H; Schneppershoff S; Schreck S; Rau G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 9697064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Arcidiacono G; Corvi A; Severi T
    J Biomech; 2005 Jul; 38(7):1483-90. PubMed ID: 15922759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tears in bioprosthetic heart valve leaflets without calcific degeneration.
    Haziza F; Papouin G; Barratt-Boyes B; Christie G; Whitlock R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8834723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.