These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7174722)

  • 21. IMPACT OF SEX COMPOSITION OF LIVING CHILDREN AND COUPLES' AGREEMENT ON SUBSEQUENT FERTILITY IN INDIA.
    Kastor A; Chatterjee S
    J Biosoc Sci; 2018 Sep; 50(5):666-682. PubMed ID: 29168438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of son preference on the contraceptive use and fertility of Sri Lankan women.
    De Silva WI
    J Biosoc Sci; 1993 Jul; 25(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 8360227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preferences for sex of children: a multivariate analysis.
    Krishnan V
    J Biosoc Sci; 1987 Jul; 19(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 3624297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intention versus behaviour in parental sex preferences among the Mukogodo of Kenya.
    Cronk L
    J Biosoc Sci; 1991 Apr; 23(2):229-40. PubMed ID: 2061350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of women's status on sex differentials in infant and child mortality in South Asia.
    Amin S
    Genus; 1990; 46(3-4):55-69. PubMed ID: 12343334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Son preference in Bangladesh: an emerging barrier to fertility regulation.
    Amin R; Mariam AG
    J Biosoc Sci; 1987 Apr; 19(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 3584179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using a mixture model to detect son preference in Vietnam.
    Haughton D; Haughton J
    J Biosoc Sci; 1996 Jul; 28(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 8698715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sex distribution in sibships according to occupation of parents.
    Bernstein ME
    Genus; 1981; 37(3-4):179-88. PubMed ID: 12264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Son preference, fertility desire and contraceptive use in two largest cities of Pakistan.
    Farooqui MN
    Pak Popul Rev; 1990; 1(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 12317086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex preference and third birth intervals in a traditional Indian society.
    Nath DC; Land KC
    J Biosoc Sci; 1994 Jul; 26(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 7929485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Micro-consequences of low fertility in Singapore.
    Cheung PP
    Asia Pac Popul J; 1990 Dec; 5(4):35-46. PubMed ID: 12343030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Family size, sex composition of children and contraceptive use: a case study of Kerala.
    Suchindran CM; Ramakumar R; Sathi Devi K
    Genus; 1993; 49(1-2):165-80. PubMed ID: 12345254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Primogeniture and fertility: fertility models with unequal bequest.
    Parsons DO
    Res Popul Econ; 1984; 5():167-83. PubMed ID: 12266411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Netherlands Fertility Survey 1982: age of the woman at first marriage and at first birth by social variables].
    Van Hoorn WD
    Maandstat Bevolking; 1985 Nov; 33(11):35-45. PubMed ID: 12280323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sex ratios, family size, and birth order.
    Biggar RJ; Wohlfahrt J; Westergaard T; Melbye M
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Nov; 150(9):957-62. PubMed ID: 10547141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sex differences in attitudes towards newborn infants among women of Mexican origin.
    Engle PL; Scrimshaw SC; Smidt R
    Med Anthropol; 1984; 8(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 6536852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Family configuration and family size.
    Gualtieri CT; Hicks RE
    Soc Biol; 1986; 33(1-2):146-7. PubMed ID: 3775436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Their struggle for equality has begun.
    Mankekar K
    Yojana; 1988 May 16-31; 32(9):23-5. PubMed ID: 12281794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Transformations of the rural Colombian family].
    Ordonez Gomez M
    Profamilia; 1991 Jun; 7(17):28-37. PubMed ID: 12284193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The choice between a married or unmarried first union by young adults. A competing risk analysis.
    Liefbroer AC
    Eur J Popul; 1991 Sep; 7(3):273-98. PubMed ID: 12158962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.