These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7175022)

  • 1. Differences between psychophysical "suppression effects" under diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1380-3. PubMed ID: 7175022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.
    Yama MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):327-35. PubMed ID: 1737881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions.
    Nitschmann M; Verhey JL; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3188-98. PubMed ID: 20000932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.
    van de Par S; Luebken B; Verhey JL; Kohlrausch A
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():293-301. PubMed ID: 23716235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral integration of broadband signals in diotic and dichotic masking experiments.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):317-26. PubMed ID: 1737880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The phase angle of addition in temporal masking for diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yost WA; Grantham DW; Lutfi RA; Stern RM
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7118730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural critical masking bands.
    Sever JC; Small AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Nov; 66(5):1343-50. PubMed ID: 500972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NoSo and NoS pi thresholds as a function of masker level for narrow-band and wideband masking noise.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Dec; 76(6):1699-703. PubMed ID: 6520307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 4031260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking produced by broadband noise presented in virtual auditory space.
    Carlile S; Wardman D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3761-8. PubMed ID: 8969477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers.
    Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.
    Buss E; Hall Iii JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):907-19. PubMed ID: 21361448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.
    Schooneveldt GP; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 2921409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
    Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG; Hall JW; Grose JH; Pillsbury HC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.