188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7175062)
1. Relationship between fixation disparity curves and symptoms in monofixators.
London R; Wick B
J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Nov; 53(11):881-4. PubMed ID: 7175062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Actual measurement of fixation disparity and its use in diagnosis and treatment.
Sheedy JE
J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Dec; 51(12):1079-84. PubMed ID: 7204818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparisons of commercially available devices for the measurement of fixation disparity and associated phorias.
Brownlee GA; Goss DA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 3403890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The symptomatic patient with normal phorias at distance and near: what tests detect a binocular vision problem?
Gall R; Wick B
Optometry; 2003 May; 74(5):309-22. PubMed ID: 12795318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Do prism corrections according to H.-J. Haase affect ocular prevalence?].
Schroth V; Jaschinski W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Jan; 224(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 17260317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Mallett Fixation Disparity Test: influence of test instructions and relationship with symptoms.
Karania R; Evans BJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Sep; 26(5):507-22. PubMed ID: 16918777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of associated heterophoria measurements using the Mallett test for near vision and the Sheedy Disparometer.
Pickwell LD; Gilchrist JM; Hesler J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3419825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Areas of anomalous binocular single vision in small angle concomitant esotropia: evaluation by means of a modification of the v. Graefe technique (author's transl)].
Bagolini B; Campos E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1977 Apr; 170(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 886793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vertical fixation disparity correction: effect on the horizontal forced-vergence fixation disparity curve.
London RF; Wick B
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Sep; 64(9):653-6. PubMed ID: 3688184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of fixation disparity curve with the modified near Mallett unit and the wesson fixation disparity card in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects.
Momeni-Moghaddam H; Yekta AA; Ehsani M; Kundart J
Strabismus; 2012 Dec; 20(4):166-74. PubMed ID: 23211142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation of disparity: a steady state error of disparity-induced vergence.
Schor C
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Sep; 57(9):618-31. PubMed ID: 7425085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three binocularity evaluation methods.
Goodlaw E
J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Sep; 53(9):707-11. PubMed ID: 7130610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forced vergence fixation disparity curves at distance and near in an asymptomatic young adult population.
Wick B
Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1985 Sep; 62(9):591-9. PubMed ID: 4050961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two fixation disparity targets.
Griffin JR; Shultz WE; Vansuch JJ
J Am Optom Assoc; 1978 Aug; 49(8):905-7. PubMed ID: 701715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of illumination and foveal fusion lock on clinical fixation disparity measurements with the Sheedy Disparometer.
Wildsoet CF; Cameron KD
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 4022649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fixation disparity curve variables measured with the Sheedy Disparometer and the Wesson Fixation Disparity Card.
Goss DA; Patel J
Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 72(8):580-8. PubMed ID: 8539027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixation disparity and accommodation as a function of viewing distance and prism load.
Jaschinski W
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jul; 17(4):324-39. PubMed ID: 9390377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterophoria and fixation disparity: a review.
Kommerell G; Gerling J; Ball M; de Paz H; Bach M
Strabismus; 2000 Jun; 8(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 10980694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective vs subjective measurements of dark vergence.
Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Hoormann J; Walper N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jan; 27(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 17239194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prism that aligns fixation disparity does not predict the self-selected prism.
Otto JM; Bach M; Kommerell G
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Nov; 28(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19076557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
