These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7175956)

  • 1. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data.
    Sourdis J; Krimbas C
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 3447006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple method for constructing phylogenetic trees from distance matrices.
    Li WH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Feb; 78(2):1085-9. PubMed ID: 6940127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Jul; 4(4):406-25. PubMed ID: 3447015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficiencies of different genes and different tree-building methods in recovering a known vertebrate phylogeny.
    Russo CA; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Mar; 13(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 8742641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonuniformity of nucleotide substitution rates in molecular evolution: computer simulation and analysis of 5S ribosomal RNA sequences.
    Manske CL; Chapman DJ
    J Mol Evol; 1987; 26(3):226-51. PubMed ID: 3129569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Property and efficiency of the maximum likelihood method for molecular phylogeny.
    Saitou N
    J Mol Evol; 1988; 27(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 3138428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates.
    DeBry RW
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 May; 9(3):537-51. PubMed ID: 1584019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species, with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence.
    Saitou N; Nei M
    J Mol Evol; 1986; 24(1-2):189-204. PubMed ID: 3104615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Construction of phylogenetic trees for proteins and nucleic acids: empirical evaluation of alternative matrix methods.
    Prager EM; Wilson AC
    J Mol Evol; 1978 Jun; 11(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 671561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical properties of molecular tree construction methods under the neutral mutation model.
    Tateno Y; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1986; 23(4):354-61. PubMed ID: 3104607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nucleotide substitution models and estimation of phylogeny.
    Håstad O; Björklund M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Nov; 15(11):1381-9. PubMed ID: 12572602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twisted trees and inconsistency of tree estimation when gaps are treated as missing data - The impact of model mis-specification in distance corrections.
    McTavish EJ; Steel M; Holder MT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Dec; 93():289-95. PubMed ID: 26256643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On investigating the statistical properties of the populous path algorithm by computer simulation. Counterconclusions to those of Tateno and Nei.
    Czelusniak J; Goodman M; Moore GW
    J Mol Evol; 1978 May; 11(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 660664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.