These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7175956)

  • 21. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When is it safe to use an oversimplified substitution model in tree-making?
    Rzhetsky A; Sitnikova T
    Mol Biol Evol; 1996 Nov; 13(9):1255-65. PubMed ID: 8896378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Statistical method for estimating the standard errors of branch lengths in a phylogenetic tree reconstructed without assuming equal rates of nucleotide substitution among different lineages.
    Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Jan; 9(1):168-81. PubMed ID: 1552838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data.
    Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jan; 12(1):131-51. PubMed ID: 7877488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interior-branch and bootstrap tests of phylogenetic trees.
    Sitnikova T; Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Mar; 12(2):319-33. PubMed ID: 7700156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions.
    Fukami-Kobayashi K; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 1849180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quartet-mapping, a generalization of the likelihood-mapping procedure.
    Nieselt-Struwe K; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jul; 18(7):1204-19. PubMed ID: 11420361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do Branch Lengths Help to Locate a Tree in a Phylogenetic Network?
    Gambette P; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Pardi F; Scornavacca C
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 Sep; 78(9):1773-1795. PubMed ID: 27659024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The K tree score: quantification of differences in the relative branch length and topology of phylogenetic trees.
    Soria-Carrasco V; Talavera G; Igea J; Castresana J
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Nov; 23(21):2954-6. PubMed ID: 17890735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A computer simulation analysis of the accuracy of partial genome sequencing and restriction fragment analysis in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships.
    Qiao B; Goldberg TL; Olsen GJ; Weigel RM
    Infect Genet Evol; 2006 Jul; 6(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 16406823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tie trees generated by distance methods of phylogenetic reconstruction.
    Takezaki N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1998 Jun; 15(6):727-37. PubMed ID: 9615454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis.
    Klopfstein S; Massingham T; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):769-785. PubMed ID: 28595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock.
    Zharkikh A; Li WH
    Mol Biol Evol; 1992 Nov; 9(6):1119-47. PubMed ID: 1435238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods.
    Huang H; He Q; Kubatko LS; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2010 Oct; 59(5):573-83. PubMed ID: 20833951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference.
    Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):1073-95. PubMed ID: 8412650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods.
    Leaché AD; Rannala B
    Syst Biol; 2011 Mar; 60(2):126-37. PubMed ID: 21088009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of sequence length, tree topology, and number of taxa on the performance of phylogenetic methods.
    Charleston MA; Hendy MD; Penny D
    J Comput Biol; 1994; 1(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 8790460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.