These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7176604)

  • 1. Assessment of three modes of alaryngeal speech with a synthetic sentence identification (SSI) task in varying message-to-competition ratios.
    Clark JG; Stemple JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 7176604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alaryngeal speech intelligibility and the older listener.
    Clark JG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 3974214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of the Lombard Effect in Improving Alaryngeal Speech.
    Ng ML
    J Voice; 2021 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 31350113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of audio-visual information on the intelligibility of alaryngeal speech.
    Evitts PM; Portugal L; Van Dine A; Holler A
    J Commun Disord; 2010; 43(2):92-104. PubMed ID: 20005524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listener ratings of the intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl D; Fucci D; Petrosino L; Martin DE; McCaffrey P
    J Commun Disord; 1998; 31(4):279-88; quiz 288-9. PubMed ID: 9697040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual and acoustical analysis of alaryngeal speech: determinants of intelligibility.
    Drummond S; Dancer J; Krueger K; Spring G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Dec; 83(3 Pt 1):801-2. PubMed ID: 8961316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving alaryngeal speech intelligibility.
    Christensen JM; Dwyer PE
    J Commun Disord; 1990 Dec; 23(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 2286725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acceptability ratings and intelligibility scores of alaryngeal speakers by three listener groups.
    Bridges A
    Br J Disord Commun; 1991 Dec; 26(3):325-35. PubMed ID: 1814417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise.
    Horii Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A sindscal analysis of perceptual features for consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal talkers.
    Doyle PC; Danhauer JL; Mendel LL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Nov; 55(4):756-60. PubMed ID: 2232755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Clear Speech on Cantonese Alaryngeal Speakers' Intelligibility.
    Hui TF; Cox SR; Huang T; Chen WR; Ng ML
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2022; 74(2):103-111. PubMed ID: 34333487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech in noise.
    McColl DA
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):605-15. PubMed ID: 16377128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of stop consonants produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Gomyo Y; Doyle PC
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Jun; 18(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 2739001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The assessment of alaryngeal speech.
    Sanderson RJ; Anderson SJ; Denholm S; Kerr AI
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1993 Jun; 18(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 8365004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listener impressions of alaryngeal communication modalities.
    Knollhoff SM; Borrie SA; Barrett TS; Searl JP
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2021 Oct; 23(5):540-547. PubMed ID: 33501872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech.
    Ainsworth WA; Singh W
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1992; 44(6):297-307. PubMed ID: 1286842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of speech intelligibility between esophageal and normal speakers via three modes of presentation.
    Hubbard DJ; Kushner D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 6160319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of syllable stress in esophageal speech.
    Walker CN; Morris HL
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Feb; 21(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 3343387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preferences for three types of alaryngeal speech.
    Green G; Hults M
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 May; 47(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 7176589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.