These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7176604)

  • 21. A comparison of the intelligibility of esophageal, electrolaryngeal, and normal speech in quiet and in noise.
    Holley SC; Lerman J; Randolph K
    J Commun Disord; 1983 Mar; 16(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 6863585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Selected acoustic characteristics of emerging esophageal speech: case study.
    Binder G
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1978; 25():24-37. PubMed ID: 749216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations.
    Max L; De Bruyn W; Steurs W
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 9519117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual speaker influence on relative intelligibility of esophageal speech and artificial larynx speech.
    Kalb MB; Carpenter MA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Feb; 46(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 7206682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reaction times of normal listeners to laryngeal, alaryngeal, and synthetic speech.
    Evitts PM; Searl J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1380-90. PubMed ID: 17197503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speaking proficiency variations according to method of alaryngeal voicing.
    Williams SE; Watson JB
    Laryngoscope; 1987 Jun; 97(6):737-9. PubMed ID: 3586817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effects of Contextual Priming and Alaryngeal Speech Mode on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Listener Comfort.
    Failla S; Al-Zanoon N; Smith N; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):934.e17-934.e23. PubMed ID: 32278613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of speech using artificial larynx and tracheoesophageal puncture with valve in the same speaker.
    Merwin GE; Goldstein LP; Rothman HB
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Jun; 95(6):730-4. PubMed ID: 3999908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Correlates of sophisticated listener judgments of esophageal air intake noise.
    Knox AW; Eccleston V; Maurer JF; Gordon MC
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Feb; 20(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 3819001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of amplification on the intelligibility of speech produced with an electrolarynx.
    Verdolini K; Skinner MW; Patton T; Walker PA
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Jun; 95(6):720-6. PubMed ID: 3999906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Alaryngeal speech].
    Hibler N
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1978 Aug; 128(15):459-61. PubMed ID: 706399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Voice onset time characteristics of esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speech of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Wong J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Jun; 52(3):780-9. PubMed ID: 18978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic analyses clarify voiced-voiceless distinction in tracheoesophageal speech.
    Saito M; Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 11099157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enhancement of female esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech.
    Qi Y; Weinberg B; Bi N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2461-5. PubMed ID: 7593930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Judgments by children and adults regarding communication skills of esophageal speakers.
    Salmon SJ; Kushner H; Knox AW
    J Commun Disord; 1979 Apr; 12(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 429609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationships between speech intelligibility and word articulation scores in children with hearing loss.
    Ertmer DJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 53(5):1075-86. PubMed ID: 20220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Relevance of psychosocial factors in speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy].
    Singer S; Fuchs M; Dietz A; Klemm E; Kienast U; Meyer A; Oeken J; Täschner R; Wulke C; Schwarz R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2007 Dec; 86(12):867-74. PubMed ID: 17713877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Acoustic markers of prosodic boundaries in Spanish spontaneous alaryngeal speech.
    Cuenca MH; Barrio MM
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Nov; 24(11):859-69. PubMed ID: 20964504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.