These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7176623)

  • 1. Parameters of auditory feedback.
    Siegel GM; Schork EJ; Pick HL; Garber SR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):473-5. PubMed ID: 7176623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.
    Garber SF; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 979214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Sidetone Amplification on Vocal Function During Telecommunication.
    Tomassi NE; Castro ME; Timmons Sund L; Díaz-Cádiz ME; Buckley DP; Stepp CE
    J Voice; 2023 Jul; 37(4):553-560. PubMed ID: 33992477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed auditory feedback with children.
    Siegel GM; Fehst CA; Garber SR; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):802-13. PubMed ID: 7442213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech disruption during delayed auditory feedback with simultaneous visual feedback.
    Jones JA; Striemer D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL135-41. PubMed ID: 17902742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity of guitar playing as a function of auditory feedback.
    Johnson CI; Pick HL; Garber SR; Siegel GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jun; 63(6):1930. PubMed ID: 681625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing interference to speech in altered listening conditions.
    Howell P; Sackin S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2842-52. PubMed ID: 12083218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lombard and sidetone amplification effects in normal and misarticulating children.
    Siegel GM; Kennard KL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 6717007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production.
    Heinks-Maldonado TH; Nagarajan SS; Houde JF
    Neuroreport; 2006 Sep; 17(13):1375-9. PubMed ID: 16932142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.
    Brajot FX; Nguyen D; DiGiovanni J; Gracco VL
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 29623381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stuttering, delayed auditory feedback, and linguistic rhythm.
    Harrington J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 3352254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of sidetone amplification effect in vocal intensity.
    Chang-Yit R; Pick HL; Siegel GM
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Dec; 8(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 802981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Susceptibility to delayed auditory feedback and dependence on auditory or oral sensory feedback.
    Burke BD
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Mar; 8(1):75-96. PubMed ID: 1159107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: the role of auditory feedback.
    Jones JA; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):532-43. PubMed ID: 12558289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of delayed auditory feedback and masking on the fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Lechner BK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):343-53. PubMed ID: 491561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responses of Middle-Frequency Modulations in Vocal Fundamental Frequency to Different Vocal Intensities and Auditory Feedback.
    Lee SH; Fang TJ; Yu JF; Lee GS
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):536-544. PubMed ID: 28268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency.
    Kalinowski J; Armson J; Roland-Mieszkowski M; Stuart A; Gracco VL
    Lang Speech; 1993; 36 ( Pt 1)():1-16. PubMed ID: 8345771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory stimulation, rhythm, and stuttering.
    Martin RR; Johnson LJ; Siegel GM; Haroldson SK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 4087883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of sound immersion and communicative interaction on the Lombard effect.
    Garnier M; Henrich N; Dubois D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 53(3):588-608. PubMed ID: 20008681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.
    Lee J; Ali H; Ziaei A; Tobey EA; Hansen JHL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2788. PubMed ID: 28464686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.