These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7176904)

  • 1. Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudowords, and letters.
    Rossmeissl PG; Theios J
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 7176904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From SOFA to LOUCH: lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation.
    Rosson MB
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 6865749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic phonological coding of unattended printed words.
    Underwood G; Thwaites S
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 7176903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing times for English and Chinese words.
    Hoosain R; Osgood CE
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 6664815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrusion and location errors in the naming of letters in words and non-words.
    Solman RT
    Psychol Res; 1988; 50(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 3186875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?
    Taft M
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):465-74. PubMed ID: 7176907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation.
    Eiter BM; Inhoff AW
    Psychol Res; 2008 Nov; 72(6):666-74. PubMed ID: 18843502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria.
    Waters GS; Seidenberg MS
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Nov; 13(6):557-72. PubMed ID: 3831712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.
    Simpson GB
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Further explorations of the consistency effect in word and nonword pronunciation.
    Stanhope N; Parkin AJ
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Mar; 15(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 3683181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing.
    Henik A; Friedrich FJ; Kellogg WA
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 6633255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference.
    Lupker SJ
    Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 7172126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Jun; 119(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 2141355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.
    Mädebach A; Markuske AM; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29790121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography.
    Bentin S; Frost R
    Mem Cognit; 1987 Jan; 15(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 3821487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
    Wile TL; Borowsky R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target.
    Kiger JI; Glass AL
    Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 6633254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
    Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.
    Chumbley JI; Balota DA
    Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):590-606. PubMed ID: 6533428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.