These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7176907)
1. An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules? Taft M Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):465-74. PubMed ID: 7176907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic phonological coding of unattended printed words. Underwood G; Thwaites S Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):434-42. PubMed ID: 7176903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudowords, and letters. Rossmeissl PG; Theios J Mem Cognit; 1982 Sep; 10(5):443-50. PubMed ID: 7176904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition. Roelofs A; Ozdemir R; Levelt WJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):900-13. PubMed ID: 17723068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processing times for English and Chinese words. Hoosain R; Osgood CE Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 6664815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. From SOFA to LOUCH: lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation. Rosson MB Mem Cognit; 1983 Mar; 11(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 6865749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. Lupker SJ Can J Psychol; 1982 Sep; 36(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 7172126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Simpson GB Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):316-40. PubMed ID: 6385046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Eliciting dyslexic symptoms in proficient readers by simulating deficits in grapheme-to-phoneme conversion and visuo-magnocellular processing. Tholen N; Weidner R; Grande M; Amunts K; Heim S Dyslexia; 2011 Aug; 17(3):268-81. PubMed ID: 21793123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spelling-sound effects in reading: time-course and decision criteria. Waters GS; Seidenberg MS Mem Cognit; 1985 Nov; 13(6):557-72. PubMed ID: 3831712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Processing lexical ambiguity and visual word recognition in a deep orthography. Bentin S; Frost R Mem Cognit; 1987 Jan; 15(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 3821487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Grapheme to phoneme conversion: the basis of reading disability? Golden M; Zenhausern R Int J Neurosci; 1983 Sep; 20(3-4):229-39. PubMed ID: 6668120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing. Henik A; Friedrich FJ; Kellogg WA Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 6633255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Chumbley JI; Balota DA Mem Cognit; 1984 Nov; 12(6):590-606. PubMed ID: 6533428 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The facilitation of lexical decisions by a prime occurring after the target. Kiger JI; Glass AL Mem Cognit; 1983 Jul; 11(4):356-65. PubMed ID: 6633254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Alexia with and without agraphia: an assessment of two classical syndromes. Sheldon CA; Malcolm GL; Barton JJ Can J Neurol Sci; 2008 Nov; 35(5):616-24. PubMed ID: 19235446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parafoveal information is not sufficient to produce semantic or visual priming. Paap KR; Newsome SL Percept Psychophys; 1981 May; 29(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 7279572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Orthographic transparency and grapheme-phoneme conversion: An ERP study in Arabic and French readers. Simon G; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 16822485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]