These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7177085)
1. Is peer review effective? Handler S Minn Med; 1982 Dec; 65(12):759-60. PubMed ID: 7177085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of care stressed in peer review guidelines. Rodkey GV QA Rev; 1990 Mar; 2(2):3. PubMed ID: 10113737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Enhanced peer review immunity. Minnesota Medical Association. Minn Med; 1989 Oct; 72(10):593, 595-6. PubMed ID: 2796902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reviewer status and review quality. Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation. Stossel TP N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):658-9. PubMed ID: 3974642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care. Rothschild RD Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician. Curtis T Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies. Greeson TW; McClure DJ Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review. Ramphal M Am J Nurs; 1974 Jan; 74(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 4491941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Guidance of colleagues--a way to increased professional practice]. Granum V Fag Tidsskr Sykepleien; 1992 Feb; 80(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 1596412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Measures to encourage professional competence. Gruwez JA Acta Chir Belg; 1996; 96(5):188-91. PubMed ID: 8950377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informal peer review actions: can they survive the Health Care Quality Improvement Act? Gleitz HG; Strickland NE Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10293721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines. Van Tassel K Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]