These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7177085)

  • 1. Is peer review effective?
    Handler S
    Minn Med; 1982 Dec; 65(12):759-60. PubMed ID: 7177085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of care stressed in peer review guidelines.
    Rodkey GV
    QA Rev; 1990 Mar; 2(2):3. PubMed ID: 10113737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act. Enhanced peer review immunity. Minnesota Medical Association.
    Minn Med; 1989 Oct; 72(10):593, 595-6. PubMed ID: 2796902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reviewer status and review quality. Experience of the Journal of Clinical Investigation.
    Stossel TP
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):658-9. PubMed ID: 3974642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care.
    Rothschild RD
    Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antitrust immunity in Colorado peer review actions.
    Earnest GL
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Dec; 7(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 10296371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the quality of medical care.
    Williamson JW
    N Engl J Med; 1973 Jun; 288(25):1352-3. PubMed ID: 4735895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge and competency in medicine.
    Nix JE
    J Miss State Med Assoc; 1990 Jul; 31(7):226-7. PubMed ID: 2196373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: a perspective for performance appraisal.
    O'Loughlin EL; Kaulbach D
    J Nurs Adm; 1981 Sep; 11(9):22-7. PubMed ID: 6912299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A peer review review.
    Wencel S
    Wis Med J; 1989 Sep; 88(9):27-32, 35. PubMed ID: 2588651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review--the newcomers' perspective.
    Mainguy G; Motamedi MR; Mietchen D
    PLoS Biol; 2005 Sep; 3(9):e326. PubMed ID: 16149851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: is it working?
    Investor Owned Hosp Rev; 1976 Feb; 9(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 10273142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986--what it means to the physician.
    Curtis T
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):19-23. PubMed ID: 10284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies.
    Greeson TW; McClure DJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review.
    Ramphal M
    Am J Nurs; 1974 Jan; 74(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 4491941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Guidance of colleagues--a way to increased professional practice].
    Granum V
    Fag Tidsskr Sykepleien; 1992 Feb; 80(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 1596412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measures to encourage professional competence.
    Gruwez JA
    Acta Chir Belg; 1996; 96(5):188-91. PubMed ID: 8950377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informal peer review actions: can they survive the Health Care Quality Improvement Act?
    Gleitz HG; Strickland NE
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10293721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines.
    Van Tassel K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review and high-quality medical care.
    Wilbur DL
    Postgrad Med; 1971 Oct; 50(4):229-30. PubMed ID: 5129842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.