These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7178804)

  • 1. Distortion of the middle latency auditory response produced by analog filtering.
    Scherg M
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 7178804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High pass digital and analog filtering of the middle latency response.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD
    Ear Hear; 1987 Apr; 8(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 3582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of analog and digital filtering on auditory middle latency responses in adults and young children.
    Suzuki T; Hirabayashi M; Kobayashi K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1984; 93(3 Pt 1):267-70. PubMed ID: 6732112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short latency somatosensory and spinal evoked potentials: power spectra and comparison between high pass analog and digital filter.
    Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF; Cracco RQ; Schiff JA
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 2420570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal digital filters for analyzing the mid-latency auditory P50 event-related potential in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Liljander S; Holm A; Keski-Säntti P; Partanen JV
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jun; 266():50-67. PubMed ID: 27015794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Frequency spectra and filtering of the early auditory evoked potential].
    Tietze G; Kevanishvili Z
    HNO; 1990 Nov; 38(11):399-407. PubMed ID: 2289897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unrecognized errors due to analog filtering of the brain-stem auditory evoked response.
    Janssen R; Benignus VA; Grimes LM; Dyer RS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 May; 65(3):203-11. PubMed ID: 2420573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple algorithm for a digital three-pole Butterworth filter of arbitrary cut-off frequency: application to digital electroencephalography.
    Alarcon G; Guy CN; Binnie CD
    J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Dec; 104(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 11163409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of some nonrecursive digital filters for signals of auditory evoked responses.
    Grönfors T; Juhola M; Johansson R
    Biol Cybern; 1992; 66(6):533-6. PubMed ID: 1586677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous recording and separation of early and middle latency auditory evoked potentials.
    Scherg M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):339-41. PubMed ID: 6179761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Filtering of neurophysiologic signals.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():51-65. PubMed ID: 31277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AAEM minimonograph #39: digital filtering: basic concepts and application to evoked potentials.
    Maccabee PJ; Hassan NF
    Muscle Nerve; 1992 Aug; 15(8):865-75. PubMed ID: 1495503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.