237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7180038)
21. High-risk pregnancy. Identification and monitoring to improve outcome.
Field CS
Postgrad Med; 1984 Sep; 76(4):35-40. PubMed ID: 6473224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Monitoring high risk pregnancy by maternal counting of foetal movement.
Debdas AK; Kaur T; Menon H
J Indian Med Assoc; 1984 Feb; 82(2):57-9. PubMed ID: 6747330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Prenatal monitoring of fetal heart in high-risk pregnancies].
Weiss DB
Harefuah; 1976 May; 90(10):488-90. PubMed ID: 964738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Cyclic behavior of the fetus determined by the registration of the fetal heart rate].
Romanini C; Rizzo G; Tranquilli A; Valensise H; Gaglione R; Arduini D
Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1983; 104(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 6675500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Antepartum measurement of the preejection period in high-risk pregnancy.
Sampson MB
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 7422166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Organization of an intensive pregnancy counseling service in a district hospital].
Schmidt S
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1974 Mar; 96(12):373-5. PubMed ID: 4838443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Clinical experiences with the ultrasonic movement detector Doptone].
Resch B; Herczeg J
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1971 Jan; 93(3):86-92. PubMed ID: 5554831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Advances on the horizon.
Murata Y
Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):433-41. PubMed ID: 7116753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Fetal monitoring in pregnancy and labour.
Godfrey KA
Practitioner; 1981 Sep; 225(1359):1253-9. PubMed ID: 7312784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Fetal movements and ultrasonics].
Mattone PG; Bussolino S; Antoniello M
Minerva Ginecol; 1982 Apr; 34(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 7099477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Clinical aspects in the monitoring of pregnancy and childbirth].
Bayer H
Gynakol Rundsch; 1986; 26 Suppl 2():22-7. PubMed ID: 3570072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Fetal movements].
Neldam S
Ugeskr Laeger; 1980 Mar; 142(10):623-6. PubMed ID: 7368326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In a day's work.
Lewis L
Nurs Times; 1993 Feb 3-9; 89(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 8437918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Using the biophysical profile to assess fetal wellbeing.
Lalor J; Devane D
Pract Midwife; 2010 Jun; 13(6):16-7. PubMed ID: 20586342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Fetal activity acceleration determination.
Neldam S
Dan Med Bull; 1981 Apr; 28(2):64-6. PubMed ID: 7271911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Ultrasonic tomography in intensive pregnancy counseling].
Meinel K
Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1978; 33(24):1109-13. PubMed ID: 657966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Antenatal evaluation of FHR accelerations associated with fetal movements.
Sadovsky E; Navot D; Yaffe H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 19(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 6121725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Suspect diagnoses come with biophysical profiling.
Lemay G
Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (69):56-7. PubMed ID: 15124328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
Pan J; Ye M; Du X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Auditory evoked response: a new approach for the evaluation of the unborn fetus.
Pereira Luz N; Pereira Lima C; Germany Paula L; Hecker Luz J
Reproduccion; 1980; 4(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 7461277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
