These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7180844)

  • 1. Aspects of parameter estimation in ascertainment sampling schemes.
    Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1982 Nov; 34(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 7180844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. II. Generalizations and numerical results.
    Shute NC; Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Oct; 43(4):374-86. PubMed ID: 3177380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating parameters of the family-size distribution in ascertainment sampling schemes: numerical results.
    Ewens WJ; Asaba B
    Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):367-74. PubMed ID: 6487724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stoppage: an issue for segregation analysis.
    Slager SL; Foroud T; Haghighi F; Spence MA; Hodge SE
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Apr; 20(3):328-39. PubMed ID: 11255242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On Ewens' equivalence theorem for ascertainment sampling schemes.
    Lange K
    Am J Hum Genet; 1983 Jul; 35(4):687-94. PubMed ID: 6881144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. III. Pedigrees.
    Shute NC; Ewens WJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 1988 Oct; 43(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 3177381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ascertainment sampling problem and estimation of genetic parameters when parental haplotypes are known.
    Shute NC
    Am J Med Genet; 1988 Oct; 31(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 3232696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sampling schemes and ascertainment.
    Thompson EA; Cannings C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():363-82. PubMed ID: 523478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of segregation and linkage parameters in simulated data. I. Segregation analyses with different ascertainment schemes.
    Kramer PL; Pauls DL; Price RA; Kidd KK
    Am J Hum Genet; 1989 Jul; 45(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 2741953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem: IV. Continuous phenotypes.
    Ewens WJ; Green RM
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 3061868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal sampling for pedigree analysis: sequential schemes for sibships.
    Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):313-25. PubMed ID: 7272417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ascertainment bias in the estimation of sibling genetic risk parameters.
    Olson JM; Cordell HJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):217-35. PubMed ID: 10723107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ascertainment adjustment: where does it take us?
    Burton PR; Palmer LJ; Jacobs K; Keen KJ; Olson JM; Elston RC
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Dec; 67(6):1505-14. PubMed ID: 11078478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robust ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimation.
    Noh M; Lee Y; Pawitan Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Jul; 29(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15892092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimates revisited.
    Epstein MP; Lin X; Boehnke M
    Am J Hum Genet; 2002 Apr; 70(4):886-95. PubMed ID: 11880949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait.
    Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonrandom sampling in human genetics: familial correlations.
    Hanis CL; Chakraborty R
    IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1984; 1(2):193-213. PubMed ID: 6600103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of ascertainment-bias correction schemes for pedigrees ascertained through multiple probands.
    Majumder PP
    Stat Med; 1985; 4(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 4023475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units.
    Bonney GE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Oct; 63(4):1202-15. PubMed ID: 9758615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework.
    Vieland VJ; Hodge SE
    Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.