These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7180913)

  • 1. Clinical research and the review process--a guided tour.
    Novello AC
    Am J Nephrol; 1982; 2(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 7180913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Peer review system.
    Gross J
    Science; 1971 Jul; 173(3992):106-7. PubMed ID: 5581904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review reviewed.
    Mehl JW
    Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):i-iv. PubMed ID: 1149887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research funding.
    FASEB J; 1991 Sep; 5(12):2741-2. PubMed ID: 1916097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Editorial: Judicium parium.
    Fishman AP
    N Engl J Med; 1974 Jan; 290(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 4808447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A different peer review.
    Page IH
    JAMA; 1973 Sep; 225(10):1240-1. PubMed ID: 4740988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nurturing the biomedical research enterprise.
    Wyngaarden JB
    P R Health Sci J; 1986 Aug; 5(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 3823360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visceral viewpoints. Goals and controls - grants and contracts.
    Spiro HM
    N Engl J Med; 1975 Sep; 293(11):545-7. PubMed ID: 1152879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Institutes of Health yesterday, today, and tomorrow.
    Fredrickson DS
    Public Health Rep; 1978; 93(6):642-7. PubMed ID: 362469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The single instrument grant.
    Wade L
    Cancer; 1972 Apr; 29(4):879-81. PubMed ID: 5067105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science.
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of the National Cancer Institute in the development of cancer centers. VI. Review and evaluation of cancer research center grant applications.
    Jay GD
    Cancer; 1972 Apr; 29(4):896-901. PubMed ID: 5017355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Washington report: a conversation with Vincent T. DeVita, Jr., M.D.. Interview by Daniel S. Greenberg.
    DeVita VT
    N Engl J Med; 1980 Oct; 303(17):1014-6. PubMed ID: 7412849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Administration and finance.
    Roberson WL
    Cancer; 1972 Apr; 29(4):875-6. PubMed ID: 5017349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposal for public archive draws support, criticism.
    Travis K
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1416. PubMed ID: 15467028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catch 22 in the NIH peer review system.
    Rosenberg E
    Med Hypotheses; 1976; 2(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 933910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Cancer Act of 1971. Conference report.
    Cancer; 1972 Apr; 29(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 5017360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of the National Cancer Institute in the development of cancer centers. I. National Cancer Institute center programs.
    Saunders JP
    Cancer; 1972 Apr; 29(4):882-7. PubMed ID: 5017350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Institutes of Health. Panel weighs starter R01 grants.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2004 Jun; 304(5679):1891. PubMed ID: 15218117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.