BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7181052)

  • 1. The allergy pricker. Qualitative aspects of skin prick testing using a precision needle.
    Malling HJ; Andersen CE; Boas MB; Holgersen F; Munch EP; Weeke B
    Allergy; 1982 Nov; 37(8):563-7. PubMed ID: 7181052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of a new lancet and a hypodermic needle for skin prick testing.
    Dirksen A; Mosbech H; Søborg M; Biering I
    Allergy; 1983 Jul; 38(5):359-62. PubMed ID: 6614408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new lancet for skin prick testing.
    Osterballe O; Weeke B
    Allergy; 1979 Aug; 34(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 391093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design of an optimally-diagnostic skin test solution for diagnosis of sensitivity to timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen.
    Wheeler AW; Jessberger B; Drachenberg KJ; Rakoski J
    Clin Exp Allergy; 1996 Aug; 26(8):897-902. PubMed ID: 8877154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].
    Paranos S; Petrović S; Bojović I
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000; 128(5-6):194-9. PubMed ID: 11089421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing.
    Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standardization of the prick test. A comparative study of three methods.
    Basomba A; Sastre A; Peláez A; Romar A; Campos A; García-Villalmanzo A
    Allergy; 1985 Aug; 40(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 4051141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determination of sIgE to rPhl p 1 is sufficient to diagnose grass pollen allergy.
    Bokanovic D; Aberer W; Hemmer W; Heinemann A; Komericki P; Scheffel J; Sturm GJ
    Allergy; 2013 Nov; 68(11):1403-9. PubMed ID: 24117513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Allergen skin prick test should be adjusted by the histamine reactivity.
    Dreborg S
    Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 2015; 166(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 25765942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision of skin prick and puncture tests with nine methods.
    Demoly P; Bousquet J; Manderscheid JC; Dreborg S; Dhivert H; Michel FB
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1991 Nov; 88(5):758-62. PubMed ID: 1955634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The comparison of reactions in skin prick test performed with the standardized lancet and the injection needle].
    Semik-Orzech A; Barczyk A; Pierzchała W
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jun; 24(144):495-501. PubMed ID: 18702329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe.
    Masse MS; Granger Vallée A; Chiriac A; Dhivert-Donnadieu H; Bousquet-Rouanet L; Bousquet PJ; Demoly P
    Allergy; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1415-9. PubMed ID: 21797883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Skin reactivity to grass pollen and the mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in the prick-test using 2 types of allergen preparations].
    Godnić-Cvar J; Kanceljak-Macan B
    Arh Hig Rada Toksikol; 1989 Sep; 40(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 2638564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can component-based microarray replace fluorescent enzimoimmunoassay in the diagnosis of grass and cypress pollen allergy?
    Cabrera-Freitag P; Goikoetxea MJ; Beorlegui C; Gamboa P; Gastaminza G; Fernández-Benítez M; Ferrer M; Blanca M; Sanz ML
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2011 Oct; 41(10):1440-6. PubMed ID: 21749500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of the skin prick test.
    Vohlonen I; Terho EO; Koivikko A; Vanto T; Holmén A; Heinonen OP
    Allergy; 1989 Nov; 44(8):525-31. PubMed ID: 2610328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison between modified skin prick test with standardized allergen extracts and Phazet.
    Chanal I; Horst M; Segalen C; Dreborg S; Michel FB; Bousquet J
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1988 Nov; 82(5 Pt 1):878-81. PubMed ID: 3192871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performances of an improved device for skin prick tests.
    Caimmi D; Masse MS; Chiriac AM; Demoly P
    Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2013; 26(1):235-7. PubMed ID: 23527727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of three methods for using the Duotip-Test device for skin testing.
    Sangsupawanich P; Chamnanphol S; Koonrungsrisomboon D
    Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2000 Sep; 18(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11270470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An anomalous effect of allergen concentration on weal size elicited by skin testing for immediate hypersensitivity.
    Huggins KG; Brostoff J
    Clin Allergy; 1979 Jan; 9(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 421334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skin test diagnosis of grass pollen allergy with a recombinant hybrid molecule.
    Metz-Favre C; Linhart B; Focke-Tejkl M; Purohit A; de Blay F; Valenta R; Pauli G
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2007 Aug; 120(2):315-21. PubMed ID: 17512042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.