365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7181461)
1. Dermatoglyphics of the Naik Gond.
Ghosh GC
Anthropol Anz; 1982 Sep; 40(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 7181461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finger dermatoglyphics of the Bagathas of Araku Valley (A. P.), India.
Reddy GG
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1975 Mar; 42(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 1119544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sexual dimorphism in the Chuvashian population of Russia in two types of dermatoglyphic traits: principal component analysis.
Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E
Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):467-77. PubMed ID: 18756897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sexual dimorphism: asymmetry and diversity of 38 dermatoglyphic traits in five endogamous populations of West Bengal, India.
Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E
Coll Antropol; 2001 Jun; 25(1):167-87. PubMed ID: 11787540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-sex and intra-sex differences in quantitative digital dermatoglyphics of Sardinian-speaking groups.
Sanna E; Usai E; Floris G
Anthropol Anz; 2004 Jun; 62(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 15228194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finger dermatoglyphic variations in Rengma Nagas of Nagaland India.
Banik SD; Pal P; Mukherjee DP
Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 19408600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dermatoglyphic characteristics of a population from the central Rhodopes (south Bulgaria).
Kavgazova L; Stoev R; Mitova Z
Anthropol Anz; 1999 Dec; 57(4):349-60. PubMed ID: 10676571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative dermatoglyphic traits as measures of population distance.
Kamali MS; Mavalwala J; Khaneqah AA; Bhanu BV
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Aug; 85(4):429-50. PubMed ID: 1928316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microsatellite diversity reveals the interplay of language and geography in shaping genetic differentiation of diverse Proto-Australoid populations of west-central India.
Gaikwad S; Vasulu TS; Kashyap VK
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Feb; 129(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 16323197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relation of bruxism and dermatoglyphics.
Polat MH; Azak A; Evlioglu G; Malkondu OK; Atasu M
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 11314141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cross sectional study of dermatoglyphics and dental caries in Bengalee children.
Sengupta AB; Bazmi BA; Sarkar S; Kar S; Ghosh C; Mubtasum H
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013; 31(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 24262398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dermatoglyphic studies in congenital heart disease in India.
Ahuja YR; Annapurna V; Reddy YR; Reddy GD; Rao VS; Rao PN
Acta Anthropogenet; 1982; 6(3):141-50. PubMed ID: 7182010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital dermatoglyphics in some tribal populations of Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rao VV; Ramesh A; Vijayakumar M; Murty JS
Acta Anthropogenet; 1983; 7(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 6671023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative digital and palmar dermatoglyphics: sexual dimorphism in the Chuvashian population of Russia.
Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E
Homo; 2008; 59(4):317-28. PubMed ID: 18656864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex and side differences and correlations between quantitative palmar characteristics in a sample Sardinian population.
Floris G
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1975 Mar; 42(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 1119552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relationship between total ridge-count, absolute ridge-count and pattern intensity index revisited.
Kshatriya GK; Bhasin MK; Singh IP
Acta Anthropogenet; 1980; 4(3-4):187-93. PubMed ID: 7346049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of palmar dermatoglyphics in two ethnic Indian populations of north Bengal, India.
Sen J; Kanchan T; Mondal N
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20840285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dermatoglyphic analysis of La Liébana (Cantabria, Spain). 2. Finger ridge counts.
Martín J; Gómez P
Anthropol Anz; 1993 Jun; 51(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 8333735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complex segregation analysis of quantitative dermatoglyphic traits in five Indian populations.
Karmakar B; Yakovenko K; Kobyliansky E
Ann Hum Biol; 2005; 32(4):445-68. PubMed ID: 16147395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. a-b palmar interdigital ridge-count in the Basque population.
Arrieta I; Pastor G; González E; Ibarrondo A; Lostao CM
Anthropol Anz; 1987 Mar; 45(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 3579234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
