These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7182703)

  • 1. The measurement of patients' values in medicine.
    Llewellyn-Thomas H; Sutherland HJ; Tibshirani R; Ciampi A; Till JE; Boyd NF
    Med Decis Making; 1982; 2(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 7182703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes.
    Hellinger FJ
    Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 2927183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity of chemotherapy-induced emesis and overall survival as determinants of a global utility score.
    Grunberg SM; Srivastava A; Grunberg KJ; Weeks J
    Support Care Cancer; 2002 Nov; 10(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 12436221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the person trade-off a valid method for allocating health care resources?
    Pinto Prades JL
    Health Econ; 1997; 6(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 9142532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing values for health: numeracy matters.
    Woloshin S; Schwartz LM; Moncur M; Gabriel S; Tosteson AN
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(5):382-90. PubMed ID: 11575488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients' health status by patients and their physicians.
    Suarez-Almazor ME; Conner-Spady B; Kendall CJ; Russell AS; Skeith K
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 11310944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization--The Submacular Surgery Trials Vision Preference Value Scale: SST Report No. 6.
    Bass EB; Marsh MJ; Mangione CM; Bressler NM; Childs AL; Dong LM; Hawkins BS; Jaffee HA; Miskala P;
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 122(12):1856-67. PubMed ID: 15596591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of standard gamble utilities as measured by transplant readiness in lung transplant candidates.
    Singer LG; Theodore J; Gould MK
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 14570301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the preferences of patients with psoriasis. A quantitative, utility approach.
    Zug KA; Littenberg B; Baughman RD; Kneeland T; Nease RF; Sumner W; O'Connor GT; Jones R; Morrison E; Cimis R
    Arch Dermatol; 1995 May; 131(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 7741543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explaining distortions in utility elicitation through the rank-dependent model for risky choices.
    Wakker P; Stiggelbout A
    Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7783579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health values and prospect theory: a comment.
    Stratmann-Schoene D; Klose T
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 11206947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A pilot Internet "value of health" panel: recruitment, participation and compliance.
    Stein K; Dyer M; Crabb T; Milne R; Round A; Ratcliffe J; Brazier J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Nov; 4():90. PubMed ID: 17129380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the equivalence of collectively and individually collected responses: standard-gamble and time-tradeoff judgments of health states.
    Krabbe PF; Essink-Bot ML; Bonsel GJ
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):120-32. PubMed ID: 8778530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient utilities in fibromyalgia and the association with other outcome measures.
    Bakker C; Rutten M; van Santen-Hoeufft M; Bolwijn P; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1536-43. PubMed ID: 7473480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Feasibility of utility assessment by rating scale and standard gamble in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or fibromyalgia.
    Bakker C; Rutten M; van Doorslaer E; Bennett K; van der Linden S
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Feb; 21(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 8182636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological issues of patient utility measurement. Experience from two clinical trials.
    Rutten-van Mölken MP; Bakker CH; van Doorslaer EK; van der Linden S
    Med Care; 1995 Sep; 33(9):922-37. PubMed ID: 7666706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the person trade-off approach to examine differences between individual and social values.
    Dolan P; Green C
    Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 7(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9683091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The utility assessment method order influences measurement of parents' risk attitude.
    Finnell SM; Carroll AE; Downs SM
    Value Health; 2012; 15(6):926-32. PubMed ID: 22999143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do risk attitudes differ across domains and respondent types?
    Prosser LA; Wittenberg E
    Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 17545498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.